ovid9 wrote:I wish I could say I'm surprised by any of that, but really, I'm not.

Moderators: greatmutah, GuitarBilly
ovid9 wrote:I wish I could say I'm surprised by any of that, but really, I'm not.
[/quote]JimmyPaeg wrote:Stay classy, Texas
This child above was born at 22 weeks? Is that not a person? Can you seriously conceive clipping that child's spine and dismembering them in utero? That is exactly what this bill seeks to outlaw.
To me this has nothing what so ever to do with religion, as I'm an atheist. It has to do with compassion and empathy for an innocent living person.
Also, the legislator who said that shit about rape kits isn't a dumbass, she's just a manipulative bitch who knows what to say to get the people whose votes she wants riled up.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not someone who backs the criminalization of all abortions. I think providing access to quality education and healthcare in our country would be a far better method of decreasing both unwanted pregnancies and abortions. But I also don't think dogmatic trumpeting of either side's propaganda is helpful to having an intelligent debate on the subject.
Telephant wrote:C'mon down to Marshall town sweet tits. We're all having a helluva time.
ovid9 wrote:But, having three cats, I don't want to hurt their ears.
sleewell wrote:goop forever, thug life till I die bitch.
Dave Lister wrote:Ya'll motherfuckers don't need any or more better gear, ya'll need better ideas.
Loop wrote:I’m currently shopping for a 1996 Red Dodge Viper with yellow wheels. Who gives a shit about taste?!
Telephant wrote:nightflameauto wrote:Just the way she says, "clean her out" in that article makes me wanna track her down and throat punch her repeatedly. I mean, there's a lot of stupidity running around the world, but shit like that, where someone so completely and UTTERLY misinformed is one of the decision makers. . . well, frankly, that's getting to be way too common.
Its goddamned ridiculous how uneducated some of our representatives are. I'm straight dumbfounded and ashamed as a Texan.
thenakedarab wrote:PurpleTrails wrote:The bad part of that stupid ass bill isn't the 20 week cutoff, it's that it prescribes the type of facility that can provide abortions of any type. That is going to stop 37 out of 42 places in the huge fuckin' state of Texas that currently provide abortions from doing so in the future. So, five clinics left in the entire state to handle them.
On top of that, Texas may be the last place I would expect to add some social services to help with the coming onslaught of unwanted pregnancies.
I agree 100%.
Telephant wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/watch-texas-state-senator-13-hour-anti-abortion-172549939.html
***1776*** wrote:Telephant wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/watch-texas-state-senator-13-hour-anti-abortion-172549939.html
Im 110% Pro-Choice, -- but late term abortions are some real wicked-nasty shit, they really are. That philly abortion doctor was not doing the pro choice crowd any favors
I have no issue with fillibustering (its part of our debate process) and she has every right to do it as long as she observes the rules.. The very "odd thing" is how the media was kinda hostile and unfriendly to Rand Paul when he did the very same thing about drones a couple of weeks ago
Lets see how this continues to play out in the media
Rampage wrote:Oh, you can't play guitar because of your cats? What's next, you don't have sex with your wife because your vagina is acting up?
K-Bizzle wrote:There comes a point in every young mans life when he forsakes the skittles and mountain dew of his childhood for the beer and reese's of manhood.
ovid9 wrote:***1776*** wrote:Telephant wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/watch-texas-state-senator-13-hour-anti-abortion-172549939.html
Im 110% Pro-Choice, -- but late term abortions are some real wicked-nasty shit, they really are. That philly abortion doctor was not doing the pro choice crowd any favors
I have no issue with fillibustering (its part of our debate process) and she has every right to do it as long as she observes the rules.. The very "odd thing" is how the media was kinda hostile and unfriendly to Rand Paul when he did the very same thing about drones a couple of weeks ago
Lets see how this continues to play out in the media
Hmm, really? I usually disagree with rand on about everything, but I supported him in that even though it was meaningless. I didn't see a ton of negative coverage on it....maybe the media I've selected were ok with that one though.
And yes, late term abortions are nasty. I wish there were no abortions, but I'm not naive enough to believe life is simple enough to ever have that happen, damn what idiotic laws are passed. Its the other aspects of this law that are the most troubling to me. And that Rep's moronic statements.
I'm also not really sure why the Philly guy gets brought up though (not by you initially I know). The dude was performing often illegal procedures in criminally negligent situations. (Great work keeping up on inspections...though I have no idea how many inspectors there were for that sort of thing.) That's what most pro-choice people want to AVOID by having accessible and safe clinics. I
'm sure proponents of the Texas law would say "Oh, we ARE caring about safety..see, they have to go to surgical places." But that doesn't mean accessible. Which sadly just leaves the door open for more places like that Philly sicko to operate in. Ugh.
Sorry, rambling thoughts on the subject. Abortion saddens me greatly, but the militant "Right to Lifers" do the world no favors in their misguided efforts to end it wholesale.
***1776*** wrote:
Good post ovid![]()
The media outlets did pick on Rand Paul a lil, I saw some outlets (many) they called it gimmicky, hes doing it for 2016, its a publicity stunt, etc, - --that really iritatted me a lil bit, I wonder if they would now say the same thing about this situation
Im somewhat conservative guy, (as you may know lol), but I am and will ALWAYS be pro choice with abortion, you made some good points in your post. My 02 is Its 35+ years already (Roe vs Wade) its is *the law* of the land, let it go guys lol
Rampage wrote:Oh, you can't play guitar because of your cats? What's next, you don't have sex with your wife because your vagina is acting up?
K-Bizzle wrote:There comes a point in every young mans life when he forsakes the skittles and mountain dew of his childhood for the beer and reese's of manhood.
thenakedarab wrote:JimmyPaeg wrote:Stay classy, Texas
This ^ is a child that was born at 23 weeks, 3 weeks after that bill's cut off. Fully capable of feeling pain and instinctively capable of connecting to another person as a source of comfort/security.
This child above was born at 22 weeks? Is that not a person? Can you seriously conceive clipping that child's spine and dismembering them in utero? That is exactly what this bill seeks to outlaw.
To me this has nothing what so ever to do with religion, as I'm an atheist. It has to do with compassion and empathy for an innocent living person.
Also, the legislator who said that shit about rape kits isn't a dumbass, she's just a manipulative bitch who knows what to say to get the people whose votes she wants riled up.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not someone who backs the criminalization of all abortions. I think providing access to quality education and healthcare in our country would be a far better method of decreasing both unwanted pregnancies and abortions. But I also don't think dogmatic trumpeting of either side's propaganda is helpful to having an intelligent debate on the subject.
BrendanO wrote:Really, MSN? An elected stateswoman, and you run with "Ex-teen mom leads abortion-bill filibuster"? Motherfucking pieces of motherfucking shit.
BrendanO wrote:Really, MSN? An elected stateswoman, and you run with "Ex-teen mom leads abortion-bill filibuster"? Motherfucking pieces of motherfucking shit.