Page 1 of 2

Skanks

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 10:12 am
by clipless bumper

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:11 am
by Stratz
This article was clearly written by a pathetic douchebag that is threatened by female sexuality. What a sad piece of shit that guy must be.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:19 am
by clipless bumper
are you denying the existence of skanks?

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 12:36 pm
by Casey4s
The term "Skank" brings me to think of "The Women of Walmart' or candidates for the Jerry Springer show. I guess it's a subjective term.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:41 pm
by Lloyd Blankfein
Stratz wrote:This article was clearly written by a pathetic douchebag that is threatened by female sexuality. What a sad piece of shit that guy must be.


You're the Pussywhipped mother fucker that had to trade in his Harley for a bicycle and had your diet of meat replaced by soy beans by an 'empowered' women who doesn't shave anymore aren't you?

Seems these are the only guys who every bring up the words "woman," and "empowered" in the same sentence.

Conditioned to attack like the bulldyke lesbian your manly body has now become. :lol:

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 7:11 pm
by Stratz
Lloyd Blankfein wrote:
Stratz wrote:This article was clearly written by a pathetic douchebag that is threatened by female sexuality. What a sad piece of shit that guy must be.


You're the Pussywhipped mother fucker that had to trade in his Harley for a bicycle and had your diet of meat replaced by soy beans by an 'empowered' women who doesn't shave anymore aren't you?

Seems these are the only guys who every bring up the words "woman," and "empowered" in the same sentence.

Conditioned to attack like the bulldyke lesbian your manly body has now become. :lol:



Well, I had a bacon cheeseburger for lunch and the rest of your assumptions are just as off base as the one about my diet.

The reality of this situation is that sex is good and I like it myself. I am not going to shame and insult someone else because they like sex and have it with who they want, when they want, for whatever reason they want,.

It is hard for me to understand why a man who wants to have sex with women would insult women who have sex with men. My best guess is because they are bitter that those women don't want to have sex with them but maybe you can enlighten me. Or maybe you are just a bitter old gay man?

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 9:50 pm
by wrongnote85
Stratz wrote:
Lloyd Blankfein wrote:
Stratz wrote:This article was clearly written by a pathetic douchebag that is threatened by female sexuality. What a sad piece of shit that guy must be.


You're the Pussywhipped mother fucker that had to trade in his Harley for a bicycle and had your diet of meat replaced by soy beans by an 'empowered' women who doesn't shave anymore aren't you?

Seems these are the only guys who every bring up the words "woman," and "empowered" in the same sentence.

Conditioned to attack like the bulldyke lesbian your manly body has now become. :lol:



Well, I had a bacon cheeseburger for lunch and the rest of your assumptions are just as off base as the one about my diet.

The reality of this situation is that sex is good and I like it myself. I am not going to shame and insult someone else because they like sex and have it with who they want, when they want, for whatever reason they want,.

It is hard for me to understand why a man who wants to have sex with women would insult women who have sex with men. My best guess is because they are bitter that those women don't want to have sex with them but maybe you can enlighten me. Or maybe you are just a bitter old gay man?


G.ood
T.hank you
F.or your
O.pinion

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:07 pm
by jamminjohn
:snax:

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 3:25 am
by diablogato22
Oh shit....this is about to get really good...

:snax:

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 4:59 am
by soundgardener75
Image

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 8:17 am
by Dickarms
admittedly a pretty worthless article. everyone knows groupy skank is bast, faux skank sucks ass.

lol at stratz picking the way wrong battle in the way wrong place.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 8:37 am
by clipless bumper

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 10:10 am
by BrendanO
Lloyd Blankfein wrote:
Stratz wrote:This article was clearly written by a pathetic douchebag that is threatened by female sexuality. What a sad piece of shit that guy must be.


You're the Pussywhipped mother fucker that had to trade in his Harley for a bicycle and had your diet of meat replaced by soy beans by an 'empowered' women who doesn't shave anymore aren't you?

Seems these are the only guys who every bring up the words "woman," and "empowered" in the same sentence.

Conditioned to attack like the bulldyke lesbian your manly body has now become. :lol:


...but, you're the one who used "women" and "empowered" in the same sentence, not him. Twice. In a row. So the score's actually 2-0 at this point.

And, since Stratz is actually correct, we'll go ahead and call it 3-0.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 10:12 am
by Dickarms
yeah both are pretty lulzy.


the real losers: people who paid a company to pay someone to actually write that article.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2013 10:21 am
by Lloyd Blankfein
BrendanO wrote:
Lloyd Blankfein wrote:
Stratz wrote:This article was clearly written by a pathetic douchebag that is threatened by female sexuality. What a sad piece of shit that guy must be.


You're the Pussywhipped mother fucker that had to trade in his Harley for a bicycle and had your diet of meat replaced by soy beans by an 'empowered' women who doesn't shave anymore aren't you?

Seems these are the only guys who every bring up the words "woman," and "empowered" in the same sentence.

Conditioned to attack like the bulldyke lesbian your manly body has now become. :lol:


...but, you're the one who used "women" and "empowered" in the same sentence, not him. Twice. In a row. So the score's actually 2-0 at this point.

And, since Stratz is actually correct, we'll go ahead and call it 3-0.


No, the score is 3-0 me. Why? Because I was at Polvo's last night in South Congress and you weren't. Spent $90 on two "top-shelf" margarita pitchers that tasted like urinal cakes.

I'm in ur Austinz, eating ur messican foodz.

Deal with it.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:59 pm
by ComOp
Stratz wrote:This article was clearly written by a pathetic douchebag that is threatened by female sexuality. What a sad piece of shit that guy must be.


After reading the article, I gotta agree with this right here.

For example his "phony skank":

"There is nothing worse than a phony skank. She’s the type of girl who has been sending signals all night. She’s dressed in a skimpy outfit, overly friendly, and very touchy-feely. Not only do the two of you have a great rapport, it looks like it’s a sure thing she’ll go home with you. Then you go in for the kiss, and it’s like hitting a brick wall. She stops you in your tracks and politely explains that she “doesn’t do that.” Then she leaves and you’re stuck alone at the end of the night, having wasted your efforts on the faux skank."

She is a skank because she wouldn't sleep with him. If she had slept with him, she would have also been a skank.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 2:02 pm
by clipless bumper
ComOp wrote:She is a skank because she wouldn't sleep with him. If she had slept with him, she would have also been a skank.



Actually - she is a PHONY skank because she wouldn't sleep with him - if she had - she would have just been a garden-variety skank.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 2:18 pm
by GuitarBilly
Stratz wrote:This article was clearly written by a pathetic douchebag that is threatened by female sexuality. What a sad piece of shit that guy must be.

meh, it's not a scientific white paper on female's sexuality. Dude is clearly just joking around. Girls have articles like that about guys too. You're taking it too seriously IMHO.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 7:25 pm
by ovid9
GuitarBilly wrote:
Stratz wrote:This article was clearly written by a pathetic douchebag that is threatened by female sexuality. What a sad piece of shit that guy must be.

meh, it's not a scientific white paper on female's sexuality. Dude is clearly just joking around. Girls have articles like that about guys too. You're taking it too seriously IMHO.


But it was sexist, misogynistic and not really funny. So it sorta was lose all the way around.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 8:11 pm
by Krunchmeister
"Spent $90 on two "top-shelf" margarita pitchers that tasted like urinal cakes."

Just curious ..How do you know what urinal cakes taste like?

Re: Skanks

Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2013 10:13 pm
by wrongnote85
Krunchmeister wrote:"Spent $90 on two "top-shelf" margarita pitchers that tasted like urinal cakes."

Just curious ..How do you know what urinal cakes taste like?



give him a kiss and i beat you can find out.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:17 am
by Zozobra
wrongnote85 wrote:
Krunchmeister wrote:"Spent $90 on two "top-shelf" margarita pitchers that tasted like urinal cakes."

Just curious ..How do you know what urinal cakes taste like?



give him a kiss and i beat you can find out.


But I'm not into snowballing.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 7:18 am
by Dave
Some of you must never get laid.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 7:25 am
by Dickarms
Ron Burgundy wrote:Some of you must never get laid.


pretty sure this.

Re: Skanks

Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2013 7:35 am
by Zozobra
We all know that the brethrens of GAB plough perfect tens all day long with not as much as a pointy knee in sight.