Guitar Gear Forum

Monster, what? Isnt that the nick cage movie about snuff porn? Or am I confused?

spawnofthesith wrote:Monster, what? Isnt that the nick cage movie about snuff porn? Or am I confused?

Aren't all Nick Cage movies really about snuff porn?

That was 8mm I believe. This is Super 8 which is JJ Abrams attempting to channel young Stephen Speilberg. It almost works but in the end it really doesn't. At least not for me.

ovid9 wrote:

spawnofthesith wrote:Monster, what? Isnt that the nick cage movie about snuff porn? Or am I confused?

Aren't all Nick Cage movies really about snuff porn?

That was 8mm I believe. This is Super 8 which is JJ Abrams attempting to channel young Stephen Speilberg. It almost works but in the end it really doesn't. At least not for me.

I think you are just too young. I love Super 8 because it felt so real to me. Definitely aimed at my age groups.

Yarbicus wrote:

ovid9 wrote:

spawnofthesith wrote:Monster, what? Isnt that the nick cage movie about snuff porn? Or am I confused?

Aren't all Nick Cage movies really about snuff porn?

That was 8mm I believe. This is Super 8 which is JJ Abrams attempting to channel young Stephen Speilberg. It almost works but in the end it really doesn't. At least not for me.

I think you are just too young. I love Super 8 because it felt so real to me. Definitely aimed at my age groups.

I dunno, I LOVED the interaction of the kids. In fact, I loved all the story except how they shoehorned the monster into it. I think I'd almost have liked the movie better without a monster or military involvement or anything. That part just felt forced into an otherwise entertaining movie.

Meelosh wrote:

Elessar [Sly] wrote:The Hunger games... well I watched 65% before we got erm... distracted

Lol same story over here 2 nights ago I'd seen it in the theater and thought it was like 6/10, but after watching part of it at home I'd say it's worse

I meant I was getting laid haha. S'all good brethren.

ovid9 wrote:

spawnofthesith wrote:Monster, what? Isnt that the nick cage movie about snuff porn? Or am I confused?

Aren't all Nick Cage movies really about snuff porn?

That was 8mm I believe. This is Super 8 which is JJ Abrams attempting to channel young Stephen Speilberg. It almost works but in the end it really doesn't. At least not for me.

Ooooh duh I actually saw super 8 in theaters, I thought it was just ok, abd obviously not very memorable for me

thenakedarab wrote:Ted: 7/10. I laughed, I cried (not really, but I could have), I thought of unspeakable sex acts with Mila Kunis, I did the Flash Gordan jump. Would do again.

I haven't seen this for a while, I'll have to stick it on again.

Lords of Salem. 3/10 for visual style alone. For fuck's sake; will someone please write a good script for RZ so he make a good movie for once?

Finaly watched The Great Gatsby. Leo was pretty good as Gatsby. You definitely believed he was in love with Daisy and would go to any length to get her back. Toby was pretty good too. The visuals were great. The anachronistic music didn't work for me at all though.

We're the Millers - 8/10 the whole movie was packed with pretty funny jokes, story line wasn't bad, pretty enjoyable movie all around. I gave an extra point due to the Jennifer Aniston stripper scenes. She had a rockin body.

Krull - 7/10 - I was expecting it to be much worse... but it was alright. Famous cast much!

Elessar [Sly] wrote:The Hunger games... well I watched 65% before we got erm... distracted So I will have to watch it again and then give a proper score.

I miss those days. Used to be it didn't matter what movie. At one point, the lady and I made it only halfway through The Silence of the Lambs, for chrissake.

Now, we could watch a movie with 47 shirtless Taylor Lautners washing dishes and doing household chores and I STILL wouldn't be able get her "distracted".

Enjoy it while you can.

indienoise wrote:

Elessar [Sly] wrote:The Hunger games... well I watched 65% before we got erm... distracted So I will have to watch it again and then give a proper score.

I miss those days. Used to be it didn't matter what movie. At one point, the lady and I made it only halfway through The Silence of the Lambs, for chrissake.

Now, we could watch a movie with 47 shirtless Taylor Lautners washing dishes and doing household chores and I STILL wouldn't be able get her "distracted".

Enjoy it while you can.

I know that feeling all too well... I'm lucky I have found someone new - not for that specific reason

I liked Super 8. Ovid probably just wished there were more scenes of Katherine Heigl finding love in the last place she ever expected

Only God Forgives 2/10


Its like they tried to make an epic movie, but the only epicness was in the fail. The "story" went no where and there was about 2 hours too much of useless camera shots of nothing.

Killing Them Softly, 0/10 - I picked this up bc of the casting, but holy got damm shit, it's THE worst movie I've ever seen. Think Friday the 13th remake, Godzilla w/ Broderick bad. I stopped about about 35 mins bc I couldn't take anymore.

Barton Fink 6/10 - Early Coen Bros. work, but excellent work from Turturro and Goodman make it a good one-watcher if you have nothing else to see on NF Instant.

I still need to see into darkness

ShaneV wrote:I liked Super 8. Ovid probably just wished there were more scenes of Katherine Heigl finding love in the last place she ever expected

spawnofthesith wrote:Only God Forgives 2/10


Its like they tried to make an epic movie, but the only epicness was in the fail. The "story" went no where and there was about 2 hours too much of useless camera shots of nothing.

I find a lot of movies are suffering from this right now. Stop making freaking "epics" and just make decent entertaining movies.

Saw 21 jump street again. 8.6 out of 10.

Lords of Salem 4/10 - This movie started out okay, but then it just descended into 0_o and repeat another hour. I dunno wtf is up with RZ. House of 1K Corpses is the type of movie he needs to be making. Over the top, ridiculously unrealistic, violent, but with campy humor and some lulz in there via some really sick shit. The Devil's Rejects, both Halloweens (although the first one was okay) and now this, I just don't get it. It's like if he'd just take some input or as someone else said assist with the script or story development, they could all be really good horror flicks. I really was excited for it too, and had some good parts, but overall it was just lolwut by the end.

Elessar [Sly] wrote:Saw 21 jump street again. 8.6 out of 10.

That was a surprisingly hilarious movie. Everyone said it was funny so I wasn't expecting to laugh like I did but it was great. I think the sequel comes out next summer. Tatum should do more roles like that, he can be lulz.

RSBro wrote:

Elessar [Sly] wrote:Saw 21 jump street again. 8.6 out of 10.

That was a surprisingly hilarious movie. Everyone said it was funny so I wasn't expecting to laugh like I did but it was great. I think the sequel comes out next summer. Tatum should do more roles like that, he can be lulz.

No, Tatum should play the role he played in This is the End more. That's essentially his essence in any movie he appears in anyway.

Unless it's the same role. I haven't seen 21 Jump Street.

Was that the alien one with Craig and Jonah and all them? If so, yeah probably a similar role lol.

Watched Alien again. Watching that movie really makes you hate CGI when you see what can be achieved without it.

nakedzen wrote:Watched Alien again. Watching that movie really makes you hate CGI when you see what can be achieved without it.

Yes.