Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sought...

Talk about subjects not related to music or gear. Please keep discussions civil and follow the GGF rules of conduct at all times. Political and religious topics are not allowed.

Moderators: greatmutah, GuitarBilly

User avatar
Sasquatch
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 5528
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:38 pm
Location: Montgomery, AL

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by Sasquatch »

madryan wrote:
Lloyd Blankfein wrote:There's many different strokes within the conservative arena, just as there are in the liberal arena.

This blog posts really just describes the conservative neocapitalists.

The guys whose dad threw them keys to a fully functioning corporation, the ones who went to Harvard- or the skull and bones types. They're the privileged ones. These types don't understand problems as they were never given any.

These are the guys who are 18 in BMW's.


Now me, I find that the new gadget crowd or the new sneaker crowd are actually more from the lower class Obama types. These are the same guys who shoot eachother in line at a new Jordan shoe release. I don't see that with other groups. Or trample people in line at Walmart on Black Friday. You know this is true, and since we're using broad generalizations, lets throw it out there.


There are other conservatives, like me, who don't give a shit about gay marriage or pot or abortions.

I'm a steward of my land, I agree with a lot of environmental protections. That's why California looks like California and Texas looks like the surface of the moon.

I have no problem with programs that help people who hit a wall, I do have a problem with inner city scumfucks who use their assistance to buy crack, the trailer fucks who use it to buy meth and the Mexican women who don't get married legally so they can claim single mother status while amigo works for cash.

I don't like old white guys who grew up in a time where they could graduate high school and buy a house while working at a plant making washing machines try to tell people my age that we are lazy and entitled (entitled? Lets talk about social security, Medicare, or you off shoring all our jobs in the 70's and 80's, yeah, we're entitled).


You and I agree on alot and we're definitely not typical.

Lots of the folks in the drivers seat adhere to the ideology I highlighted above. It's a real problem.



sure, but there are a lot of people like us out there; a lot. this ^^ is pretty much how i feel and most people i know feel, and i live in alabama. i am not saying this is the majority of people's views, but it is a nice large portion of people 45 or so and under. the homophobes and thugstas need to figure out that gay isn't a choice and that school is kind of important.
:cup:

:crap:
rear naked
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 1562
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:03 am
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by rear naked »

That OP is just as vomit inducing as some of the anti dem rants I read.


Madryan, I am disappoint :facepalm:
User avatar
Dickarms
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 14084
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Austin TX

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by Dickarms »

without reading the whole thread yet, heres my brief response to the initial list, coming from being raised by an extreme right wing father who also happens to be shit poor and dependent on govt health care (interesting conundrum), based what i actually observe to be the true motives behind the policies. most of them arent that far off.


No gay marriage – Homosexuality makes me uncomfortable (due to misguided religious influence, poor upbringing or both) so gay people should be punished because of my beliefs. Stoopid homos…
Exactly true. how they think to the fullest. no defense there.

No welfare, food stamps or Medicaid – I’m not poor enough to qualify for these programs so my tax dollars shouldn’t pay for it. Stoopid poor people and by poor I really mean black…
more so they believe the poor should be helped, but are ENRAGED by the mere thought of someone taking advantage of that system. and the black part is totally accurate. also, and this will be a running theme, they are more upset about being MADE to do it than doing it, as far as helping goes. my dad uses several social assistance programs so he doesnt oppose them of course, but just hates imagining people taking advtantage. and he imagines those people to be black out of pure racism.

No health care reform – Why should I help pay for other people who are sick when I’m not? Stoopid sick people…
again, this is more about being MADE to. and even i agree the obamacare thing, while well intentioned, is way fucked.

No environmental protection – Environmental laws makes things more expensive for me and that’s bad. I also don’t understand the concept of long term impact; I want cheap gas and gadgets now! Stoopid…ah, you get the idea…
pretty accurate.

Don’t raise my taxes – EVER. The government can find its own money to pay for stuff.
pretty accurate. though from an economic standpoint, it is true that the govt should be, at least at this point, figuring out how to reappropriate its tax revenue it has instead of increasing it for the time being, considering the giant leaks and gaps everywhere. pouring more water into a bucket wont fill it any more. once that is relatively settled, yeah, new programs = new taxes pretty much.

Medicare – Young conservatives: Why should I help pay for old people and the disabled? Older conservatives: Keep your government hands off my Medicare!

Social Security – Young conservatives: Sacrifices need to be made, people should take care of themselves, not depend on handouts from people like me. Older conservatives: Sacrifices need to be made BUT DON’T YOU TOUCH MY SOCIAL SECURITY!
most conservatives i know are pretty much agreed about the need for SS reform. but they may be the outliers.

No abortion – The government should tell women what to do with their bodies because Idon’t like abortion.
yup, christian ignorant-of-biology horseshit.

No prayer in school? – GOVERNMENT OVERREACH!! I like Republican Jesus™ so everyone should have to listen to my prayers. No Muslim prayers, though. That’s indoctrination.
yup, but yet again this starting to confuse the actual political views of a conservative republican with the fanatical delusions of the christian right. yes, they can be the same people, but aren't always.
Beer==>SG==>Pedals==>Orange TV50
Telephant wrote:C'mon down to Marshall town sweet tits. We're all having a helluva time. :cop:

ovid9 wrote:But, having three cats, I don't want to hurt their ears.

sleewell wrote:goop forever, thug life till I die bitch.

Dave Lister wrote:Ya'll motherfuckers don't need any or more better gear, ya'll need better ideas.

Good Deals: TU BE, Steveijobzz, MikeO, Pamuk Party, Heath
User avatar
Telephant
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 15907
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 5:44 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by Telephant »

Ultimately the problem with the Republican party is their version of Christianity informs their politics, thus making them fucking retarded.
User avatar
Dickarms
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 14084
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Austin TX

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by Dickarms »

largely very true, and at the core of the main party's voting agenda.

it sucks being someone with a brain who cant fit into either slobbering horde, and knowing that the country will always suffer because of it.
Beer==>SG==>Pedals==>Orange TV50
Telephant wrote:C'mon down to Marshall town sweet tits. We're all having a helluva time. :cop:

ovid9 wrote:But, having three cats, I don't want to hurt their ears.

sleewell wrote:goop forever, thug life till I die bitch.

Dave Lister wrote:Ya'll motherfuckers don't need any or more better gear, ya'll need better ideas.

Good Deals: TU BE, Steveijobzz, MikeO, Pamuk Party, Heath
soulsurfer

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by soulsurfer »

I don't know where you guys live, but more than half of the Christians I know personally are Dems.
I do believe there to be 'old skool' politics mixed with old world religion/traditions.

to be honest, growing up in the Midwest, and having family from the south (how are your preconceived notions doing?) and now I live in SoCal (beautiful place! beautiful ppl!) We have about an even split when it comes to points of view.
Politics and Religion are two completely separate things. They do overlap of course, just as anyone's philosophical views would...but are still separate. Meaning one can be a Christian and a Dem, or be a Rep and have no affiliation with a church at all.

As I pointed out above, Christians are very compassionate toward the poor/needy...inspite of extreme idiots on either side pointing out the 'extremeness' of the other. laughable.

it was Christians that invented the hospital and the orphanage. I'l also bet that statistically (purely anecdotal at this point) that all the ppl that are moved/helped out of poverty, religious (not just Christian) orgs are behind most the successes.
This is also why (real or imagined) it is hard for me to look at every and I do mean every person that I am able to help has NOT been helped by any government agency.
they've gotten money/food but have not been helped out of poverty. While my Private Faith-based non-profit that gets 0$ from any government agency is batting above .800

There is more to helping than tossing food stamps and a bus pass at someone.
User avatar
Elbutcho
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 112
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 2:42 pm

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by Elbutcho »

Lloyd Blankfein wrote:California looks like California and Texas looks like the surface of the moon.


Huh.....please splain that one
User avatar
Dickarms
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 14084
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Austin TX

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by Dickarms »

soulsurfer wrote:I don't know where you guys live, but more than half of the Christians I know personally are Dems.
I do believe there to be 'old skool' politics mixed with old world religion/traditions.

to be honest, growing up in the Midwest, and having family from the south (how are your preconceived notions doing?) and now I live in SoCal (beautiful place! beautiful ppl!) We have about an even split when it comes to points of view.
Politics and Religion are two completely separate things. They do overlap of course, just as anyone's philosophical views would...but are still separate. Meaning one can be a Christian and a Dem, or be a Rep and have no affiliation with a church at all.

As I pointed out above, Christians are SUPPOSED TO BE, AND TRY TO APPEAR TO BE, but as a cross section are generally equal or less to an average person on the kindness/judgement scale, very compassionate toward the poor/needy...inspite of extreme idiots on either side pointing out the 'extremeness' of the other. laughable.

it was Christians that invented the hospital and the orphanage. I'l also bet that statistically (purely anecdotal at this point) that all the ppl that are moved/helped out of poverty, religious (not just Christian) orgs are behind most the successes.
This is also why (real or imagined) it is hard for me to look at every and I do mean every person that I am able to help has NOT been helped by any government agency.
they've gotten money/food but have not been helped out of poverty. While my Private Faith-based non-profit that gets 0$ from any government agency is batting above .800

There is more to helping than tossing food stamps and a bus pass at someone.


FTFY ;)


on the real though, i have seen some insane gracious acts of humanity from christianity. i have also seen some of the filthiest acts i've been witness to done by them. its just another group of people. and i wouldn't even normally single them out if it weren't for a) their declaration of kindness and charity supposedly being a defining quality b) the rarity that it really happens how its supposed to.


i mean it is ironic, as many funny memes illustrate that right wing christian fanatics basically worship a socialist jewish hippie.
Beer==>SG==>Pedals==>Orange TV50
Telephant wrote:C'mon down to Marshall town sweet tits. We're all having a helluva time. :cop:

ovid9 wrote:But, having three cats, I don't want to hurt their ears.

sleewell wrote:goop forever, thug life till I die bitch.

Dave Lister wrote:Ya'll motherfuckers don't need any or more better gear, ya'll need better ideas.

Good Deals: TU BE, Steveijobzz, MikeO, Pamuk Party, Heath
soulsurfer

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by soulsurfer »

Y0UNGBL00D wrote:
soulsurfer wrote:I don't know where you guys live, but more than half of the Christians I know personally are Dems.
I do believe there to be 'old skool' politics mixed with old world religion/traditions.

to be honest, growing up in the Midwest, and having family from the south (how are your preconceived notions doing?) and now I live in SoCal (beautiful place! beautiful ppl!) We have about an even split when it comes to points of view.
Politics and Religion are two completely separate things. They do overlap of course, just as anyone's philosophical views would...but are still separate. Meaning one can be a Christian and a Dem, or be a Rep and have no affiliation with a church at all.

As I pointed out above, Christians are SUPPOSED TO BE, AND TRY TO APPEAR TO BE, but as a cross section are generally equal or less to an average person on the kindness/judgement scale, very compassionate toward the poor/needy...inspite of extreme idiots on either side pointing out the 'extremeness' of the other. laughable.

it was Christians that invented the hospital and the orphanage. I'l also bet that statistically (purely anecdotal at this point) that all the ppl that are moved/helped out of poverty, religious (not just Christian) orgs are behind most the successes.
This is also why (real or imagined) it is hard for me to look at every and I do mean every person that I am able to help has NOT been helped by any government agency.
they've gotten money/food but have not been helped out of poverty. While my Private Faith-based non-profit that gets 0$ from any government agency is batting above .800

There is more to helping than tossing food stamps and a bus pass at someone.


FTFY ;)


on the real though, i have seen some insane gracious acts of humanity from christianity. i have also seen some of the filthiest acts i've been witness to done by them. its just another group of people. and i wouldn't even normally single them out if it weren't for a) their declaration of kindness and charity supposedly being a defining quality b) the rarity that it really happens how its supposed to.


i mean it is ironic, as many funny memes illustrate that right wing christian fanatics basically worship a socialist jewish hippie.


I know what you mean. People are ppl. Not to stray too far off, but (and this is just my opinion) it isn't religion that makes one a good person. Right. I mean I see ppl break 'rules' everyday. some pretty dangerous ones..others selfishly break them...I don't think being a Christian or not changes that.
Again, JMO, but it is being in relationship with a living God that changes ppl. You become that which you worship. if I identify myself with a loving heavenly father, then I'll probably start to act like a loving child of a loving God. chip off the old block and all that.

the irony is those that are judging others for 'judging' are doing the exact same thing. LOL. We are to make a judgment call on right and wrong...i.e., NOT judge the person but the action. Christian or not.
As for Jesus, he himself said that He came to fulfill the law. Can't be more conservative than that. The difference is He also demonstrated Grace...unmerited favor toward a world that is acting like enemies instead of loving children.

So, we no longer are under the law. We've been set free and are to set others free from the mindset of 'rules' and 'laws'. "it is finished", said a wise loving God.
User avatar
Harvest
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 923
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:06 pm
Location: Calgary, AB

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by Harvest »

I find the very fact that we self-identify as liberals or conservatives interesting... and immediately bias the other side as wrong. Not just wrong: Stupid, knuckle-dragging, mongoloids.

I was recently in Phoenix after not being in the states for a while. We have our own left/right biases here in Canada (which boil down to left and slightly more left although pundits will tell you it's fundamental extremism), but if Phoenix is any representation the US is a completely different ballgame. Just the sheer amount of bleeting going on from both sides of the bench is mind boggling. I don't know if it's mob mentality to the extreme or what it is. Seems like EVERYTHING down there lumps you into one group or the other. If you buy a nonfat latte from Starbucks you're a liberal hippie who's waiting for the resurgence of Marxism. If you OWN a Starbucks store you're a right-wing fascist for making money on something. Nobody is just a person, trying to make their way through life - they're so called mortal enemies, even though they are ironically intimately connected.

It has been identified from history that as economic conditions worsen, the support for more extreme ideologies on both sides of the spectrum increases. This is popping up everywhere - everywhere in the Eurozone, and now under the guise of normal Democrat and Republican politics in the US. Who's behind that? Some would argue the real Lloyd Blankfein (not our GAB imposter :lol:), Jamie Diamond, Ben Bernanke, and the rest of the banker cronies who tried to make us believe that perpetual exponential economic growth is possible.

As for religion, I think in this day and age, under objective review we can see that the most heinous acts in history have been done in the name of God - mostly the Christian God or Muslim God... take your pick. A rational person of any denomination would realize that a diverse population should probably be governed by a more tolerant set of rules than any text that has been mistranslated for thousands of years tells us to. We generally don't think Sharia law is a good idea, yet often fail to see that Christian-based lawmaking is effectively the same thing to people of other faiths.

For the record I call myself a fiscal conservative and social moderate.
User avatar
madryan
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 6624
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:43 pm

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by madryan »

soulsurfer wrote:I don't know where you guys live, but more than half of the Christians I know personally are Dems.
I do believe there to be 'old skool' politics mixed with old world religion/traditions.

to be honest, growing up in the Midwest, and having family from the south (how are your preconceived notions doing?) and now I live in SoCal (beautiful place! beautiful ppl!) We have about an even split when it comes to points of view.
Politics and Religion are two completely separate things. They do overlap of course, just as anyone's philosophical views would...but are still separate. Meaning one can be a Christian and a Dem, or be a Rep and have no affiliation with a church at all.

As I pointed out above, Christians are very compassionate toward the poor/needy...inspite of extreme idiots on either side pointing out the 'extremeness' of the other. laughable.

it was Christians that invented the hospital and the orphanage. I'l also bet that statistically (purely anecdotal at this point) that all the ppl that are moved/helped out of poverty, religious (not just Christian) orgs are behind most the successes.
This is also why (real or imagined) it is hard for me to look at every and I do mean every person that I am able to help has NOT been helped by any government agency.
they've gotten money/food but have not been helped out of poverty. While my Private Faith-based non-profit that gets 0$ from any government agency is batting above .800

There is more to helping than tossing food stamps and a bus pass at someone.


I know lots of cool Christians. Lots of them are rational "normal" folks. The problem is the more vocal among them tend to be howling bigots. Seems that the more outspoken the Christian, the more closed minded and bigoted their belief system.

Now, that in itself isn't a problem. People can be fuckwads all they want in the privacy of their homes. My problem starts and ends at the tea party. They've co-opted our political process and completely corrupted it all in the name of Republican Jesus. All one need do is look at out spoken teatards like Santorum and Bachman who on the one hand, espouse all sorts of religious nonsense, and on the other hand, are among the most hateful, bigoted people in our government. It doesn't stop there. Most of the southern Republicans are complete tools and feel justified in their beliefs.

Image
soulsurfer

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by soulsurfer »

Sorry that your encounters with Christians have been less than admirable. I still stand on 'ppl are ppl' regardless of philosophy/religious beliefs. If we're all honest, we've all failed our own expectations...I have failed my own bar so-to-speak...and I know that everyone has.
lowering the bar doesn't count. perfection is the only way to go. and no one can claim that. All have failed miserably. No one is perfect, "no not one". (while we're [mis]quoting) romans 3:23.
Because if we aren't shooting for perfection, then someone is going to be left behind, or hurt or whatever...then someone has it right and someone has it wrong. The only way to go is absolute perfection.

Otherwise, we all get to argue our point of view. no one's beliefs are better than the next for all of them will leave someone hurt. get it?

BTW, in the old testament if you misquoted 'the word' , you got stoned. regardless of your point. it made it a lot easier to find those that would pervert the law. the problem with that point of view is one gets the 'letter of the law' right, but misses the 'heart of the law'. Which is the whole reason to have rules to begin with.

madryan, you have to allow EVERYONE's point of view if you are going to demand that yours be followed.

And there-in lies the problem. Whose 'rules' or values or philosophy or religion or whatever gets followed?

I can't vote on YOUR personal views. It doesn't work that way. However, you ARE going to vote on your personal views because that IS how it works.
You don't have to bend your convictions to meet mine...nor do I have to compromise my beliefs to meet yours. That doesn't make sense.

Pedophiles and murders would get to vote against my beliefs...oh-wait...they DO get to! Well holy fuck-a-duck, bestiality has just become legal.
That doesn't mean you have to agree with it...nor does it mean you have to shut up about it. it just means that some fuckwad gets to marry his pet lizard until the law is repealed or not. I don't have to like it either. But on it does. Lizards get raped.

BTW, that's my new band "molested lizards"
User avatar
Walt
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 3568
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 4:29 pm
Contact:

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by Walt »

These are (mostly) spoiled men who have traditionally gotten by with a wink and a handshake.
The crux of political problems are the result of ego. X attempts to impose beliefs on Y who reciprocates by attempting to impose. Too many politicians talking but no one is hearing. Tolerance is maddening.

As was stated above numerous times, economics and morals need to be kept objectively separate.

Trying to solve one problem seems to create 2 more. No one wants to lay their neck on the line for fear of not being re-elected.
I think someone in another thread mentioned that these decision-makers (this term appears to have become some sort of perverted oxymoron) need to be locked in a room until they can figure out how to compromise without getting all bitchy. Yeah.

What happened to common ground? I'm 43, and I've gotten out of politics in the last 10 years or so because I can't find enough politicians to like anymore.

From where I stand, I think I'll just go hop in my too much of a big pick-up and drive to the skatepark for a sesh. When I'm done, I'll go shoot my M1A (safely and legally, mind you) at targets which don't have parents (meaning...um nothing with a heart or brain), all the while cranking South of Heaven from my much-too-loud truck stereo. Then I think I'll cruise to my house (bought with an FHA loan, thank you America!), burn a bowl (legal in my state!), and play my guitar at ear splitting volumes.... neighbors be damned.
If I come off sounding like a hypocrite, that's fine, because I'm not sure I know what a hypocrite is anymore. I think calling someone hypocritical makes one a hypocrite(?)
:facepalm: (for myself)
Yes, my head is in the sand, and probably up my ass too. :lol:
User avatar
madryan
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 6624
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:43 pm

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by madryan »

soulsurfer wrote:Sorry that your encounters with Christians have been less than admirable. I still stand on 'ppl are ppl' regardless of philosophy/religious beliefs. If we're all honest, we've all failed our own expectations...I have failed my own bar so-to-speak...and I know that everyone has.
lowering the bar doesn't count. perfection is the only way to go. and no one can claim that. All have failed miserably. No one is perfect, "no not one". (while we're [mis]quoting) romans 3:23.
Because if we aren't shooting for perfection, then someone is going to be left behind, or hurt or whatever...then someone has it right and someone has it wrong. The only way to go is absolute perfection.

Otherwise, we all get to argue our point of view. no one's beliefs are better than the next for all of them will leave someone hurt. get it?

BTW, in the old testament if you misquoted 'the word' , you got stoned. regardless of your point. it made it a lot easier to find those that would pervert the law. the problem with that point of view is one gets the 'letter of the law' right, but misses the 'heart of the law'. Which is the whole reason to have rules to begin with.

madryan, you have to allow EVERYONE's point of view if you are going to demand that yours be followed.

And there-in lies the problem. Whose 'rules' or values or philosophy or religion or whatever gets followed?

I can't vote on YOUR personal views. It doesn't work that way. However, you ARE going to vote on your personal views because that IS how it works.
You don't have to bend your convictions to meet mine...nor do I have to compromise my beliefs to meet yours. That doesn't make sense.

Pedophiles and murders would get to vote against my beliefs...oh-wait...they DO get to! Well holy fuck-a-duck, bestiality has just become legal.
That doesn't mean you have to agree with it...nor does it mean you have to shut up about it. it just means that some fuckwad gets to marry his pet lizard until the law is repealed or not. I don't have to like it either. But on it does. Lizards get raped.

BTW, that's my new band "molested lizards"


It's not Christianity. It's all religion.

Religion doesn't belong in the public political sphere.

See, when you're making "Christianity" or whatever part of your public identity it automatically assigns a set of standards to you. Those standards are going to be completely different depending on whomever you encounter, which is why it has no place in political life. If you're an NGO or a church or whatever, or even a business then fine, but if you're a publicly funded endeavor then leave the religion out of it. Leave the sanctimonious bullshit out of your speeches, and leave the bronze age "morality" out of policy and laws which you enact.

Ironically, given my military background I have zero problem with Muslims and some of my best friends are Muslim because without fail, every Muslim I've ever encountered has lived by the letter of their religion. Where Muslims and I start having issues is when they feel the need to force, as in with the threat of death, their neighbors, families, etc. to follow the same sheet of music.

It's a weird conundrum with me. Despite being an agnostic I was on the board of a church for several years. I saw several churches which we were partnered up with, not only from the side that the parishioner sees, but from the business side. I saw the books, I sat in on policy meetings. Our church was an experiment which some friends of mine who were Christian tried to get going to help out the Homeless. It was a separate satellite mission whereby we acted as a church they could attend, a clearinghouse of sorts to help them find local services such as dentists who provided free services for the homeless, counseling and medical care for free for the homeless, and of course, we were affiliated with all the big drug counseling and mental health organizations. The affiliation with the bigger churches came because in one case, we were using their abandoned building which we turned into a church, and another church we were getting our guys to help out in their soup kitchen and whatnot.

So our little project went on and was actually quite successful. It required lots of time and effort. I was onboard because as I've mentioned before my dad had lived and died homeless. I was probably spending 20 hours a week completely without any sort of pay as were the 4 or 5 of us who were really making it work.

Then our pastor, who was the only paid member needed to retire because his wife was sick.

So we started looking for a new pastor. After looking for about 6 months we finally found a guy who looked like a good fit. Seemed to be excited about the mission, etc.

Within 4 months he was complaining that we had no tithing base. wanted to get rid of the homeless guys and get more "normal" families so we could become a more mainstream church.

Within 6 months he'd packed the board with 3 more members who would do anything he wanted and started voting him pay raises.

Within 8 months He started pushing for the Worship team, which we'd always used to play at the local shelters to get the word out about our services to be exclusive to our church only and setting up all sorts of neighborhood gigs for us. All the sudden I was spending the same 20 hours a week managing the worship team and all that but we never left the parking lot.

At about 10 months the 4 or 5 of us who were really doing all the work all along and had been doing the Homeless mission for years were down to me and my buddy Bob. We both drafted our resignation letters and left.

Couple of observations:

Bob and I acted as liaisons with our landlords and parent church. Several times in order to keep from being evicted we had to beg to keep using our building because they wanted to expand and sell it for office space. The only reason we managed to stay as long as we did was twofold. 1) the real estate market was sluggish at the time and 2) we threatened to bring our congregation of homeless guys up to their $5.6 Million dollar brand new church on the east side. That freaked them out lol.

The pastor and adjunct pastors were making 6 figures or very close in virtually all cases at not only the church we were partnered with but several other large churches in the area. WTF?

I've been around alot of churches and spent 5 years working for a company which identified as a "Christian" company. There's any number of different types of "Christian" but here's my take on them. Most Christians fall into a couple of different groups which correspond with society (no surprise there)

1) The awesome folks. These people are just great folks. They happen to believe in God and probably think they're doing what they should but they'd be that way regardless.

2) The misguided folks. These people are easily led. They're not naturally curious so they latch on to an ideology and believe what they're told, usually whatever "feels" right. This is the politicians bread and butter. Churches are built on these people. They can be great, they can be complete dicks but the problem is they don't understand the why or the how.

3) The dicks/Sociopaths. These are the folks who are truly evil. They'll use any handy ideology to justify it, but really they're just dicks. Lots of them become politicians.

Note, understand that in itself, Christianity isn't the problem. People are the problem. But that doesn't mean any religion, no matter how benevolent has any place at all in my government.
soulsurfer

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by soulsurfer »

But madryan, do you understand that the very thing you said you don't want in 'my government', is what you are bringing (or better said) sending to DC. 'I want it this way, but I don't want it your way'

Everyone has their ideals, their belief system that governs their day-to-day walk. You, me everyone has their own moral compass. It doesn't matter where you get it from.
In the context of personal choices, you MUST follow your own compass. (no matter what that is)
In the context of government choices, EVERYONE (even religious idiots) have an equal say.

Fortunately, our government system allows for both to be represented. Your personal belief system gets sent to DC by you and those with like minds and hearts.
Likewise, my personal belief system gets sent to DC by me and those with like minds and hearts.
Also, Every single voting person gets the same deal...even jerks.

As for ppl following their own 'rules', I will say it until i'm blue and dead... ppl are ppl. I have countless friends (closer than acquaintances), colleagues, family and neighbors that are not in any way affiliated with a religion. Many that are. The one thing that they all have in common is that they all fuck up daily. Big and small fuck ups daily.
They all have a moral compass. It is their own. They all have the same right as you and I do to "vote our conscience". We (you me and everyone) also have the right to feel any way we like about whatever we like...including the laws that govern the land.

Why would the "99%" get to complain (who did not seem to want to represent me personally, but took the liberty to include me in their stats and rants) and not anyone else?

Talk about hypocrisy.
User avatar
madryan
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 6624
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:43 pm

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by madryan »

soulsurfer wrote:But madryan, do you understand that the very thing you said you don't want in 'my government', is what you are bringing (or better said) sending to DC. 'I want it this way, but I don't want it your way'

Everyone has their ideals, their belief system that governs their day-to-day walk. You, me everyone has their own moral compass. It doesn't matter where you get it from.
In the context of personal choices, you MUST follow your own compass. (no matter what that is)
In the context of government choices, EVERYONE (even religious idiots) have an equal say.

Fortunately, our government system allows for both to be represented. Your personal belief system gets sent to DC by you and those with like minds and hearts.
Likewise, my personal belief system gets sent to DC by me and those with like minds and hearts.
Also, Every single voting person gets the same deal...even jerks.

As for ppl following their own 'rules', I will say it until i'm blue and dead... ppl are ppl. I have countless friends (closer than acquaintances), colleagues, family and neighbors that are not in any way affiliated with a religion. Many that are. The one thing that they all have in common is that they all fuck up daily. Big and small fuck ups daily.
They all have a moral compass. It is their own. They all have the same right as you and I do to "vote our conscience". We (you me and everyone) also have the right to feel any way we like about whatever we like...including the laws that govern the land.

Why would the "99%" get to complain (who did not seem to want to represent me personally, but took the liberty to include me in their stats and rants) and not anyone else?

Talk about hypocrisy.


It's really quite simple. If your personal belief system is based on trouncing the rights of others then it's not valid in today's society.

It's not hard. My cousin doesn't have the "right" to marry the person she chooses because of a bunch of narrow minded cunts following their own personal prejudices and using a book written in the bronze age as justification. That's wrong. Period. She's being deprived of a whole host of civil rights under our constitution because someone decided to codify their religious beliefs into law. It'd be different if Marriage were entirely divorced from the civil aspect of our society as it should be, but it's not so there's a whole host of rights and responsibilities which one accrues with marriage that cannot be easily or cheaply acquired otherwise.

The other side argues that they're being deprived of their religious freedom if we allow gays to marry but this simply isn't the case. You're free to worship the shrub in your yard in this country. You're not however, free to force the rest of us to worship that shrub.

Your idea that we all get equal representation by default or some such is nonsense. That's true democracy, mob rule. That's anarchy. We elect leaders to represent our interests and it's their views which then get expressed.

The biggest problem we have now is that all our "elected" representatives have forgotten that they represent everyone back home, not just the ideologues who voted them in. They represent the folks who voted against them as well as the folks who didn't vote.

Similarly, many have forgotten that they all need to function within the overarching framework of our constitution and the laws which govern us. That's the root of our current shutdown. The assholes responsible have forgotten how a representative democracy functions. When you cast your votes you live by the outcome. Period. You don't then stage a coup to try and force the majority to bend to your will. That's tyranny.
User avatar
***1776***
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 2617
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:34 pm
Location: New York!

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by ***1776*** »

Im finding your post to be all over the place - Tryanny is governing against the will of the people (to an extent) and this bullshit is constantly happening in DC

That healthcare bill was shoved down our throats (you can like it or hate the bill itself), but the fact is the bill was armtwisted and political promises and armturning and favors to special interests. I am still pissed about how the "process" went down after Scott Brown won in Mass (liberal state) running AGAINST Obamacare and 60th vote


Wars, govt spending and invading countries (see Syria last month and the public against it thankfully didnt happen)


This fascination you have with the teaparty is misguided, it really is. The ideas and platforms are something most Americans agree with..

Smaller non invasive role of goverment (NSA anyone?)...
Term limits....
States Rights over a 2 powerfull DC
Constution amendments
Balancing budgets, etc


Talk about representation? Go check a map of the USA with actual counties and the voter breakdown, its a somewhat center right breakdown when you look coast 2 coast.
Last edited by ***1776*** on Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
^ Good deals with Glizard (ADA), electricdreams (Vetta) Fat Lou (Splawn) Tubesteakfortone (Marshall 3203, Riot pedal) agreed (Hafler-Radial) twisty571 (Mosvalve 962) Orbis Mortis (egnater) ~Abstract~ (JC amp) jn062181 (AXE - FX) ^


PS - I was the owner of the 1,000,000 post on the HCAF 7/28/2006
User avatar
madryan
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 6624
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:43 pm

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by madryan »

***1776*** wrote:Im finding your post to be all over the place - Tryanny is governing against the will of the people (to an extent) and this bullshit is constantly happening in DC

That healthcare bill was shoved down our throats (you can like it or hate the bill itself), but the fact is the bill was armtwisted and political promises and armturning and favors to special interests. I am still pissed about how the "process" went down after Scott Brown won in Mass (liberal state) running AGAINST Obamacare and 60th vote


Wars, govt spending and invading countries (see Syria last month and the public against it thankfully didnt happen)


This fascination you have with the teaparty is misguided, it really is. The ideas and platforms are something most Americans agree with..

Smaller non invasive role of goverment (NSA anyone?)...
Term limits....
States Rights over a 2 powerfull DC
Constution amendments
Balancing budgets, etc


You left out drug testing welfare recipients
all the xenophobic rhetoric
all the other class-based bullshit.

etc...

and by "most" you really mean "Most red state Americans" because those of us in most blue states don't really. Ironically, us blue states are footing the bill for the Red states so we must be doing something right.
User avatar
Lloyd Blankfein
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 1615
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:07 pm

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by Lloyd Blankfein »

Xenophobic? I laugh at this, especially because Europe is worse than we are with it.

If you goto France, Italy, etc all you see is xenophobia. Yet no one says shit about it.

People with an America flag lunch pail here are redneck xenophobes. Bitches with Union Jack lunch pails are hip, cool and worldly.

Xenophobic is merely just another hypocritical word joy behar and her fans like to parrot.
soulsurfer

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by soulsurfer »

madryan wrote:
soulsurfer wrote:But madryan, do you understand that the very thing you said you don't want in 'my government', is what you are bringing (or better said) sending to DC. 'I want it this way, but I don't want it your way'

Everyone has their ideals, their belief system that governs their day-to-day walk. You, me everyone has their own moral compass. It doesn't matter where you get it from.
In the context of personal choices, you MUST follow your own compass. (no matter what that is)
In the context of government choices, EVERYONE (even religious idiots) have an equal say.

Fortunately, our government system allows for both to be represented. Your personal belief system gets sent to DC by you and those with like minds and hearts.
Likewise, my personal belief system gets sent to DC by me and those with like minds and hearts.
Also, Every single voting person gets the same deal...even jerks.

As for ppl following their own 'rules', I will say it until i'm blue and dead... ppl are ppl. I have countless friends (closer than acquaintances), colleagues, family and neighbors that are not in any way affiliated with a religion. Many that are. The one thing that they all have in common is that they all fuck up daily. Big and small fuck ups daily.
They all have a moral compass. It is their own. They all have the same right as you and I do to "vote our conscience". We (you me and everyone) also have the right to feel any way we like about whatever we like...including the laws that govern the land.

Why would the "99%" get to complain (who did not seem to want to represent me personally, but took the liberty to include me in their stats and rants) and not anyone else?

Talk about hypocrisy.


It's really quite simple. If your personal belief system is based on trouncing the rights of others then it's not valid in today's society.

It's not hard. My cousin doesn't have the "right" to marry the person she chooses because of a bunch of narrow minded cunts following their own personal prejudices and using a book written in the bronze age as justification. That's wrong. Period. She's being deprived of a whole host of civil rights under our constitution because someone decided to codify their religious beliefs into law. It'd be different if Marriage were entirely divorced from the civil aspect of our society as it should be, but it's not so there's a whole host of rights and responsibilities which one accrues with marriage that cannot be easily or cheaply acquired otherwise.

The other side argues that they're being deprived of their religious freedom if we allow gays to marry but this simply isn't the case. You're free to worship the shrub in your yard in this country. You're not however, free to force the rest of us to worship that shrub.

Your idea that we all get equal representation by default or some such is nonsense. That's true democracy, mob rule. That's anarchy. We elect leaders to represent our interests and it's their views which then get expressed.

The biggest problem we have now is that all our "elected" representatives have forgotten that they represent everyone back home, not just the ideologues who voted them in. They represent the folks who voted against them as well as the folks who didn't vote.

Similarly, many have forgotten that they all need to function within the overarching framework of our constitution and the laws which govern us. That's the root of our current shutdown. The assholes responsible have forgotten how a representative democracy functions. When you cast your votes you live by the outcome. Period. You don't then stage a coup to try and force the majority to bend to your will. That's tyranny.


Come on now, having differing points of view has been the blessing and curse from the beginning. It's just that there is a very near perfect split down the middle on hot topic issues lately.
I do understand our democratic republic. I also understand (bc of this near 50/50 split) that there is a very fine line to walk as a politician. In most cases impossible.

I do believe that our 'leaders' aren't leading. they are arguing over topics. the president promised to bring both sides together. yeah, right.
In the case of our beloved government, they are supposed to be creating an environment where we can all pursue happiness. sometimes we have to fight and make others unhappy at first, in order to set them free from their own shackles of ignorance.
As long as it doesn't harm anyone (in person or property) we should be free to have religion, sex, work, music taste, color prefs, and have a favorite cereal without the government's hand in volved. except to ensure those pursuits.

Just as society is coming around to treating gays as ppl instead of hedonistic butt fuckers (c). It hasn't done this without a fight from both points of view. Good for both sides for standing and fighting for what they believe in...regardless of who is winning at the moment.

Madryan, no one is moving freely toward any random 'new' perspective that comes along, because ppl do think and have feelings and a hope for a better future. But it isn't wisdom to follow a group or leader that hasn't shown any care or consideration for where ppl are at...no matter where they may stand on issues.

You want me to follow you to new horizons? Then show me you care about me and my best interests. (you don't have to agree with them- but show me you care). educate me on other points of view. let me discover the error of my ways instead of beating me with the proverbial hypocritical stick of progress.

Our leaders aren't leading. They are killing us with hypocrisy.
User avatar
madryan
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 6624
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:43 pm

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by madryan »

Lloyd Blankfein wrote:Xenophobic? I laugh at this, especially because Europe is worse than we are with it.

If you goto France, Italy, etc all you see is xenophobia. Yet no one says shit about it.

People with an America flag lunch pail here are redneck xenophobes. Bitches with Union Jack lunch pails are hip, cool and worldly.

Xenophobic is merely just another hypocritical word joy behar and her fans like to parrot.


You, like me live in a heavily latino area. Some of the best people in the world. Solid family ties, hard workers, good, decent folks for the most part as I think you'd agree.

The Tea Party rhetoric pertaining to these people, many of whom are 2 or 3 generations in this country is vomit inducing. The problem is the Tea Party is sort of fragmented and their statements are fairly generic and ambiguous. Take for instance this poster I snagged off the "Official" tea party site...

Image

WTF...

This is mostly responding to 1776...

I've seldom seen a bunch of fear filled, asinine garbage. I know people who have been here for a couple of generations and still don't speak English. Doesn't stop them from doing just fine. Their kids are going to college to be Doctors, Lawyers, Teachers, etc.

Drug Test for Welfare? Does that include Corporate Welfare? Who pays for the Drug Testing? The states who have done this have found that Welfare Recipients are much less likely to use drugs than the general public. Fl. spent millions on this and found less than 2% of people on Welfare were using drugs. And then, lets not overlook the constitutionality of this as the blatant violation of the 4th amendment.

Which of course brings us to the "Culture" clause on our poster. They want to teach the bill of rights yet imply they're going to violate it several times just on this poster.

"Tax Reform" The Tea Party doesn't understand tax policy. Period. They've got no idea what the fuck they're talking about. They're a shill group for a bunch of billionaires who don't want to pay taxes which is their whole "tax reform" platform. Tax the "Job Creators" less and make the middle class shoulder the burden. This goes against a couple hundred years of actual economic theory which we know works. Great idea.

Here's another gem off their site. You can buy it...

Image

So Ted Cruz, arguably the mastermind behind our current shutdown is wholeheartedly supported by the Teatards. Awesome.

Here's the problem with that. Our system of government doesn't support this current shutdown.

As I mentioned previously, you live in a representative Democracy, you vote, you count the votes, you live by the outcome. Period. You don't get to have a Coup because your side lost. That's tyranny. That's something that happens in other countries. Not here. That's something that goes directly against our constitution and our rule of law which these assholes purport to hold above all else.

So in other words the Tea Party is full of shit.
User avatar
***1776***
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 2617
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:34 pm
Location: New York!

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by ***1776*** »

Lloyd Blankfein wrote:Xenophobic? I laugh at this, especially because Europe is worse than we are with it.

If you goto France, Italy, etc all you see is xenophobia. Yet no one says shit about it.

People with an America flag lunch pail here are redneck xenophobes. Bitches with Union Jack lunch pails are hip, cool and worldly.

Xenophobic is merely just another hypocritical word joy behar and her fans like to parrot.


No no no only American conservatives are xenophobic :freak:


Ever see what happens ALL OVER THE WORLD? ----- in the carribean with lighter skin shades and darker people? how about Italy? (where my family is from) between the north and south! Any of you aware of the term black irish? (somewhat deragatory) in Ireland for non 'pure' Irish? ,etc, etc ---- this is global thing, not limited to any culture or country!


Extremist? Yea paying your bills and following the constitution and not wanting Washington DC to get 2 powerfull or intrusive in our lifes and telling us how much soda to drink or salt or ice cream to eat or what soap to use :( - yea thats extreme!


Paint your opponent as a extremist and try topaint them into a corner, conquer and divide, thats politics 101 and its been done a long time! Wash rinse repeat!



PS....... Goverment shutdown? I think 84% of goverment workers are still working, Obama hinself said that the airports are open, military is being paid, mail is being delivered, etc, etc... What may scare some people is that we will find out how much "pork" is in the system
^ Good deals with Glizard (ADA), electricdreams (Vetta) Fat Lou (Splawn) Tubesteakfortone (Marshall 3203, Riot pedal) agreed (Hafler-Radial) twisty571 (Mosvalve 962) Orbis Mortis (egnater) ~Abstract~ (JC amp) jn062181 (AXE - FX) ^


PS - I was the owner of the 1,000,000 post on the HCAF 7/28/2006
User avatar
Noah
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 4457
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:00 pm

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by Noah »

madryan wrote:As I mentioned previously, you live in a representative Democracy, you vote, you count the votes, you live by the outcome. Period. You don't get to have a Coup because your side lost. That's tyranny. That's something that happens in other countries. Not here. That's something that goes directly against our constitution and our rule of law which these assholes purport to hold above all else.

So in other words the Tea Party is full of shit.


I'm no constitutional law professor but I seem to remember somewhere that the House levies taxes, and being reelected every two years is supposed to be somewhat subject to the whims of the people. The Supreme Court ruled that the Individual Mandate penalty is a tax. Therefore the system is functioning as it was designed. Most people don't want to pay the penalty, and they elected representatives to stop it.

The previous House who originally passed the bill chose to delay its onerous tax for years, and has no power over the current House. Now the President and the Senate are trying to say that they have the power to pick and choose which parts of the bill they comply with, but the House is saying that's not fair, if you're going to pick parts of the bill you like then we should be at the table as we're the ones responsible for raising the money for the whole thing. That doesn't seem unreasonable to me. If we're going to be taxed as hard as we are we should be able to have the control to stop it after two years if we don't like it or if the President is warping the execution of the bill to favor his political cronies.
User avatar
madryan
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 6624
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:43 pm

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by madryan »

That's the point though. It's not the house. It's 40 tea party members holding the rest hostage because they didn't get their way.
soulsurfer

Re: Interesting Blog Post... Input from Conservatives sough

Post by soulsurfer »

madryan wrote:That's the point though. It's not the house. It's 40 tea party members holding the rest hostage because they didn't get their way.


So you say that 40 is more powerful than 400?
Post Reply