Guitar Gear Forum

Lol. You have no idea what due process is, and if you did, you'd know better than to apply it to this situation. Dorner had already killed cops and others, stated he was going to continue to do so, and demonstrated his intention to do so by shooting more and engaging in a firefight until the cops set the building on fire. Had he surrendered, then yes, due process would apply. He did not, and it ended as it was inevitably going to. Due process doesn't have a thing to do with it at that point. Shut the fuck up.

This guy wasn't an "insider." He washed out of the Field Training process, and didn't bring his bullshit allegations to light until he thought it would keep him from being washed out. Fuck him.

not knowing the meaning of words has never stopped marshallnoise before, i am sure he will continue to post racist, uniformed and incorrect things even though no one here likes him or wants him around.

Hapless: I simply disagree with you. Cops trying to light someone on fire for killing another person absolutely denies Dorner the opportunity to be charged with his crimes. If there was a firefight at that moment and the cops were returning fire, fine. Then the cops are simply protecting themselves. But setting the cabin ablaze is something entirely different. Judge, jury and executioner.

Edit: You are a cop, aren't you Hapless?

Hey Sleewell, fuck you. Take a poll, see how many people want me gone from here. If 75% of you do, fine, I will leave.

I don't think I was given due process before that fuck you, lol. You are so dumb its funny.

Start your own poll you ignorant half wit, but don't weasel out when its unanimous telling you to GTFO.

sleewell wrote:I don't think I was given due process before that fuck you, lol. You are so dumb its funny.

Start your own poll you ignorant half wit, but don't weasel out when its unanimous telling you to GTFO.

marshallnoise wrote:Hapless: I simply disagree with you. Cops trying to light someone on fire for killing another person absolutely denies Dorner the opportunity to be charged with his crimes. If there was a firefight at that moment and the cops were returning fire, fine. Then the cops are simply protecting themselves. But setting the cabin ablaze is something entirely different. Judge, jury and executioner.

Edit: You are a cop, aren't you Hapless?

Hey Sleewell, fuck you. Take a poll, see how many people want me gone from here. If 75% of you do, fine, I will leave.

Uh...genius...they were involved in an active firefight with the guy. They ended the firefight. It's not about what's fair. He lost. The manner in which he lost doesn't matter in the least. Due process doesn't enter into it.

Hapless wrote:

marshallnoise wrote:Hapless: I simply disagree with you. Cops trying to light someone on fire for killing another person absolutely denies Dorner the opportunity to be charged with his crimes. If there was a firefight at that moment and the cops were returning fire, fine. Then the cops are simply protecting themselves. But setting the cabin ablaze is something entirely different. Judge, jury and executioner.

Edit: You are a cop, aren't you Hapless?

Hey Sleewell, fuck you. Take a poll, see how many people want me gone from here. If 75% of you do, fine, I will leave.

Uh...genius...they were involved in an active firefight with the guy. They ended the firefight. It's not about what's fair. He lost. The manner in which he lost doesn't matter in the least. Due process doesn't enter into it.

A 4 hour active firefight...

LOL marshallnoise

People should know not to argue with you, I mean all you do is repeat back what ever the old, white guy, AM radio show host tells you is the "truth".

marshallnoise wrote:

Hapless wrote:

marshallnoise wrote:Hapless: I simply disagree with you. Cops trying to light someone on fire for killing another person absolutely denies Dorner the opportunity to be charged with his crimes. If there was a firefight at that moment and the cops were returning fire, fine. Then the cops are simply protecting themselves. But setting the cabin ablaze is something entirely different. Judge, jury and executioner.

Edit: You are a cop, aren't you Hapless?

Hey Sleewell, fuck you. Take a poll, see how many people want me gone from here. If 75% of you do, fine, I will leave.

Uh...genius...they were involved in an active firefight with the guy. They ended the firefight. It's not about what's fair. He lost. The manner in which he lost doesn't matter in the least. Due process doesn't enter into it.

A 4 hour active firefight...

Oh for fucks sake. Believe what you want, moron.

ComOp wrote:LOL marshallnoise

People should know not to argue with you, I mean all you do is repeat back what ever the old, white guy, AM radio show host tells you is the "truth".

Which one? What is silly is the prevailing notion that "there is nothing to see here folks, just move along. It's all over now..." attitude.

You are a cop, right Hapless?

I'm not sure that there is enough tin foil in the world for this shit.

Cover up? Not sure what to cover up, but they did go BBQ on him Waco-style which is pretty shitty but whatever. At least it was just him and he was actively shooting back and not a bunch of women and children that got set on Broil for 28hrs because the Feds couldn't handle the situation...

... But back to the important stuff... Yeah, boi, that chick is at least semi-hot. Gots a ring in her nose. Open for Bidness. Game On!

Quick quiz:

You have promised a $1.2MM reward payout. You:

A) Want to give away your $1.2MM
B) Do NOT want to give away your $1.2MM

***1776*** wrote:.... I REALLY REALLY want to do bad things to that host, shes fucking SEXAYY and has a look!

Things involving plastic toys and soft cheese?