Page 2 of 3

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:07 pm
by sleewell
i have owned 50 marshalls, all your opinions are invalid and stupid

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:23 pm
by phrophus
sleewell wrote:i have owned 50 marshalls, all your opinions are invalid and stupid


I have owned 50 marshalls and toured all over, and I say that OP should buy dis: http://www.ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-1968-WH ... 337fb12f32

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:32 pm
by marshallnoise
Having never played a Splawn, but having owned several Marshalls...there is nothing like a Marshall. Most anything claiming to be a hotrodded Marshall is simply using the Marshall platform for their own tone stack. When it comes down to it, there are 4 major amp types and then variants built off of them.
    Fender
    Marshall
    Vox
    Dr. Z

In my opinion, those are the four tastes available to guitarists and all else are modifications of those designs.

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:36 pm
by sleewell
having never owned or even played a splawn i can legitmately tell you its not a marshall

great post dude!

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:00 pm
by Mesa/Kramer
I love my DSL 50 and have it dialed in really good.

Just I have some cash coming my way and seeing if there is something out there better than the DSL for 2k or less.

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:27 pm
by '63-Strat
marshallnoise wrote:Having never played a Splawn, but having owned several Marshalls...there is nothing like a Marshall. Most anything claiming to be a hotrodded Marshall is simply using the Marshall platform for their own tone stack. When it comes down to it, there are 4 major amp types and then variants built off of them.
    Fender
    Marshall
    Vox
    Dr. Z

In my opinion, those are the four tastes available to guitarists and all else are modifications of those designs.


I was with you until Dr.z which offer their take on the prior 3.

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:46 pm
by cibyl
LesPaul-Marshall wrote:[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hgk378ONphM[/video]

Some of Reinhold's early work ... :love: :love: :love:


Meh,..ok sounding. I don't know kinda one dimensional. He's probably got EMG's in that guitar -- just putrid.

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:49 pm
by Norton666
LesPaul-Marshall wrote:[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T9uzDasXag[/video]

If u want Marshall toan without a Marshall this is it, but it will cost you.


Sounds like a stock Marshall to me :idk:

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:10 pm
by marshallnoise
'63-Strat wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:Having never played a Splawn, but having owned several Marshalls...there is nothing like a Marshall. Most anything claiming to be a hotrodded Marshall is simply using the Marshall platform for their own tone stack. When it comes down to it, there are 4 major amp types and then variants built off of them.
    Fender
    Marshall
    Vox
    Dr. Z

In my opinion, those are the four tastes available to guitarists and all else are modifications of those designs.


I was with you until Dr.z which offer their take on the prior 3.


I suppose lots of his stuff starts with other amps. I guess I was thinking of the Ghia as a completely original design.

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:15 pm
by Dave
marshallnoise wrote:Having never played a Splawn, but having owned several Marshalls...there is nothing like a Marshall. Most anything claiming to be a hotrodded Marshall is simply using the Marshall platform for their own tone stack. When it comes down to it, there are 4 major amp types and then variants built off of them.
    Fender
    Marshall
    Vox
    Dr. Z

In my opinion, those are the four tastes available to guitarists and all else are modifications of those designs.



Yeah, I agree with 63 Strat. Dr Z makes great amps but they're all his take on various Marshalls, fenders and voxes.

The Ghia is his 18 watt Marshall clone :thu:

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:25 pm
by '63-Strat
Chuck Nutz wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:Having never played a Splawn, but having owned several Marshalls...there is nothing like a Marshall. Most anything claiming to be a hotrodded Marshall is simply using the Marshall platform for their own tone stack. When it comes down to it, there are 4 major amp types and then variants built off of them.
    Fender
    Marshall
    Vox
    Dr. Z

In my opinion, those are the four tastes available to guitarists and all else are modifications of those designs.



Yeah, I agree with 63 Strat. Dr Z makes great amps but they're all his take on various Marshalls, fenders and voxes.

The Ghia is his 18 watt Marshall clone :thu:



Yeah don't get me wrong, Dr. Z's are def great amps, but not original at all in the sense to be included in those other 3 IMO.

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 5:48 pm
by marshallnoise
Chuck Nutz wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:Having never played a Splawn, but having owned several Marshalls...there is nothing like a Marshall. Most anything claiming to be a hotrodded Marshall is simply using the Marshall platform for their own tone stack. When it comes down to it, there are 4 major amp types and then variants built off of them.
    Fender
    Marshall
    Vox
    Dr. Z

In my opinion, those are the four tastes available to guitarists and all else are modifications of those designs.



Yeah, I agree with 63 Strat. Dr Z makes great amps but they're all his take on various Marshalls, fenders and voxes.

The Ghia is his 18 watt Marshall clone :thu:


You guys are right. I don't know why I thought he had some original designs, but he doesn't. Doh! :shock:

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:38 pm
by Dave
marshallnoise wrote:
Chuck Nutz wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:Having never played a Splawn, but having owned several Marshalls...there is nothing like a Marshall. Most anything claiming to be a hotrodded Marshall is simply using the Marshall platform for their own tone stack. When it comes down to it, there are 4 major amp types and then variants built off of them.
    Fender
    Marshall
    Vox
    Dr. Z

In my opinion, those are the four tastes available to guitarists and all else are modifications of those designs.



Yeah, I agree with 63 Strat. Dr Z makes great amps but they're all his take on various Marshalls, fenders and voxes.

The Ghia is his 18 watt Marshall clone :thu:


You guys are right. I don't know why I thought he had some original designs, but he doesn't. Doh! :shock:



They do sound great, regardless!

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:10 pm
by gb74
marshallnoise wrote:Having never played a Splawn, but having owned several Marshalls...there is nothing like a Marshall. Most anything claiming to be a hotrodded Marshall is simply using the Marshall platform for their own tone stack. When it comes down to it, there are 4 major amp types and then variants built off of them.
    Fender
    Marshall
    Vox
    Dr. Z

In my opinion, those are the four tastes available to guitarists and all else are modifications of those designs.



I don't agree about Dr Z.

To me there are 5 basic tube amp types:

Marshall
Fender
Vox
Mesa (as in Mark)
Soldano (as in SLO).


They all share some things in common, even because there are only so many ways you can make a guitar amp. But for me, these 5 are the blueprints all other designs are based off of.

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 8:54 pm
by madrigal77
guitarbilly wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:Having never played a Splawn, but having owned several Marshalls...there is nothing like a Marshall. Most anything claiming to be a hotrodded Marshall is simply using the Marshall platform for their own tone stack. When it comes down to it, there are 4 major amp types and then variants built off of them.
    Fender
    Marshall
    Vox
    Dr. Z

In my opinion, those are the four tastes available to guitarists and all else are modifications of those designs.



I don't agree about Dr Z.

To me there are 5 basic tube amp types:

Marshall
Fender
Vox
Mesa (as in Mark)
Soldano (as in SLO).


They all share some things in common, even because there are only so many ways you can make a guitar amp. But for me, these 5 are the blueprints all other designs are based off of.

I'd say Mesa and Soldano are Marshall flavors, so really all you're left with is Marshall, Fender, Vox.

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:04 pm
by Rampage
madrigal77 wrote:
guitarbilly wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:Having never played a Splawn, but having owned several Marshalls...there is nothing like a Marshall. Most anything claiming to be a hotrodded Marshall is simply using the Marshall platform for their own tone stack. When it comes down to it, there are 4 major amp types and then variants built off of them.
    Fender
    Marshall
    Vox
    Dr. Z

In my opinion, those are the four tastes available to guitarists and all else are modifications of those designs.



I don't agree about Dr Z.

To me there are 5 basic tube amp types:

Marshall
Fender
Vox
Mesa (as in Mark)
Soldano (as in SLO).


They all share some things in common, even because there are only so many ways you can make a guitar amp. But for me, these 5 are the blueprints all other designs are based off of.

I'd say Mesa and Soldano are Marshall flavors, so really all you're left with is Marshall, Fender, Vox.


I have to disagree about Mesa being a Marshall flavored amp. Randall Smith cut his teeth modifying Fender amplifiers and the Mark series was developed to further those modified designs.

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:07 pm
by madrigal77
Rampage wrote:
madrigal77 wrote:
guitarbilly wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:Having never played a Splawn, but having owned several Marshalls...there is nothing like a Marshall. Most anything claiming to be a hotrodded Marshall is simply using the Marshall platform for their own tone stack. When it comes down to it, there are 4 major amp types and then variants built off of them.
    Fender
    Marshall
    Vox
    Dr. Z

In my opinion, those are the four tastes available to guitarists and all else are modifications of those designs.



I don't agree about Dr Z.

To me there are 5 basic tube amp types:

Marshall
Fender
Vox
Mesa (as in Mark)
Soldano (as in SLO).


They all share some things in common, even because there are only so many ways you can make a guitar amp. But for me, these 5 are the blueprints all other designs are based off of.

I'd say Mesa and Soldano are Marshall flavors, so really all you're left with is Marshall, Fender, Vox.


I have to disagree about Mesa being a Marshall flavored amp. Randall Smith cut his teeth modifying Fender amplifiers and the Mark series was developed to further those modified designs.

They still lean more towards the Marshall end of things than Fender though, no matter what they started out as.

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:37 pm
by Tommy Eisen
madrigal77 wrote:
Rampage wrote:
madrigal77 wrote:
guitarbilly wrote:
marshallnoise wrote:Having never played a Splawn, but having owned several Marshalls...there is nothing like a Marshall. Most anything claiming to be a hotrodded Marshall is simply using the Marshall platform for their own tone stack. When it comes down to it, there are 4 major amp types and then variants built off of them.
    Fender
    Marshall
    Vox
    Dr. Z

In my opinion, those are the four tastes available to guitarists and all else are modifications of those designs.




I don't agree about Dr Z.

To me there are 5 basic tube amp types:

Marshall
Fender
Vox
Mesa (as in Mark)
Soldano (as in SLO).


They all share some things in common, even because there are only so many ways you can make a guitar amp. But for me, these 5 are the blueprints all other designs are based off of.

I'd say Mesa and Soldano are Marshall flavors, so really all you're left with is Marshall, Fender, Vox.


I have to disagree about Mesa being a Marshall flavored amp. Randall Smith cut his teeth modifying Fender amplifiers and the Mark series was developed to further those modified designs.

They still lean more towards the Marshall end of things than Fender though, no matter what they started out as.


For sure. My Mark III red stripe simulclass sound damn Marshally.

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 10:12 pm
by shane159
The Nitro I had sounded allot bigger than my JVM and was a good bit tighter amp. They do have a Marshall type flavor, but I honestly prefer a good old fashion cranked Marshall better, but the Splawns are built way better. I prefer classic gain tones now more so maybe that is why I prefer the Marshall's :idk:

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 10:18 pm
by mumblinmofo
Just curious ... But why isn't peavey not in the discussion,were they original designs? Splawn seems to me to take a similar approach

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 10:18 pm
by Johnny'sGotTheBlues
Isn't Splawn the company that puts religious crap inside their amps?

That's enough to keep me from buying from them even if it was God's own amp (see what I did there?) and they charged a dollar. Fucking Xtians need to keep thier shit to themselves and out of my fucking face.

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 10:44 pm
by marshallnoise
Johnny'sGotTheBlues wrote:Isn't Splawn the company that puts religious crap inside their amps?

That's enough to keep me from buying from them even if it was God's own amp (see what I did there?) and they charged a dollar. Fucking Xtians need to keep thier shit to themselves and out of my fucking face.


Is this the leftist tolerance we hear so much about? :shoot:

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 12:04 am
by Edgeofdarkness
I could never take serious advice from anyone that'd pick a jvm over a QR.

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 12:15 am
by NaturalBornBoy
I've never played a QR IRL but from all of the clips I've hear of them, they sound pretty gat damned Marshall-y to my ears :idk:

So I take it from this thread that they don't sound anything like a hot-rodded Marshall then?

Re: Splawn: A better Marshall?

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 4:45 am
by Mark Starr
Mesa/Kramer wrote:Looking at picking up a new amp possibly.

Have always had an interest in the Splawn's, but have never played one.

I like the Marshall voiced sound.
Is the Splawn simply a Better Marshall, or just different?


Even though Splawn is heavily Marshall derived, it's still a Splawn voicing that strays away from the Marshall tone.

Which you may or may not like...imo.