New Ford Maverick looks rad

Talk about subjects not related to music or gear. Please keep discussions civil and follow the GGF rules of conduct at all times. Political and religious topics are not allowed.

Moderators: greatmutah, GuitarBilly

User avatar
_ej_
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 10351
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:47 am

New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by _ej_ »

Wife and I are considering trading in her Escape towards one. $20k, 40MPG and a 1500lb load capacity. Seems perfect as her daily and for weekend projects.
Colonel, Fryette Deathsquad

Guitars:
Endres Offset
Endres Offset Les Paul
Endres Telebird
2005 Gibson Les Paul Standard Faded
1978 Greco ES335
Balaguer Goliath Bass

Amplification:
VHT/Fryette Pittbull 50/CL
Marshall JCM900 2500
Vox AC30
Ashdown MAG420

User avatar
Loop Bizkit
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 4583
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:02 pm

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by Loop Bizkit »

I think they're really cool too. If I could live with a smaller truck, I'd get one of these before I'd get a Ranger. Rangers look awesome, but they still have a tiny bed, and only tow 3500lbs. So, neither can do big truck stuff, really, which makes the Maverick the more compelling of the two to me because of the pricepoint.

I have a Supercrew F150, and it's got the 5'4" bed. I hate the short bed on it. I haul my 4wheeler, dirtbikes, MTBs, and kayaks in it, and I can't close the tailgate for any of those except the MTB. A smaller bed would be even worse.
EndTime wrote:It’s a forum of Loops :D .
User avatar
_ej_
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 10351
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:47 am

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by _ej_ »

Loop wrote:I think they're really cool too. If I could live with a smaller truck, I'd get one of these before I'd get a Ranger. Rangers look awesome, but they still have a tiny bed, and only tow 3500lbs. So, neither can do big truck stuff, really, which makes the Maverick the more compelling of the two to me because of the pricepoint.

I have a Supercrew F150, and it's got the 5'4" bed. I hate the short bed on it. I haul my 4wheeler, dirtbikes, MTBs, and kayaks in it, and I can't close the tailgate for any of those except the MTB. A smaller bed would be even worse.


Ideally I'd love a longbed maverick, a full 6' bed would be amazing. However for 99% of what I want to do with the truck the small bed would work. The fact that its wide enough for a full 4'x8' sheet of ply and they've designed it with stuff like that in mind is really selling me on it.
Colonel, Fryette Deathsquad

Guitars:
Endres Offset
Endres Offset Les Paul
Endres Telebird
2005 Gibson Les Paul Standard Faded
1978 Greco ES335
Balaguer Goliath Bass

Amplification:
VHT/Fryette Pittbull 50/CL
Marshall JCM900 2500
Vox AC30
Ashdown MAG420

Dave
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 27630
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:28 am
Location: On the spectrum

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by Dave »

Front wheel drive unibody cars with a light bed attached. If you don’t need to tow anything or haul anything heavy I’m sure they’d be okay. The 40mpg hybrid has a CVT of that matters to y’all. I personally hate CVTs but some don’t mind at all.


The Ranger can be equipped to tow 7500lbs, the Jeep can do up to 7650, and both offer bed extenders to increase bed space. Both are significantly more since they’re rwd based body on frame trucks.

I agree with Pickle. Im sure they’ll sell a ton to the people that were convinced car based mini SUVs were a good idea.
MISTER NOBODY™ wrote:STFU Dave
User avatar
duncan
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:41 pm

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by duncan »

Dave wrote:Front wheel drive unibody cars with a light bed attached. If you don’t need to tow anything or haul anything heavy I’m sure they’d be okay. The 40mpg hybrid has a CVT of that matters to y’all. I personally hate CVTs but some don’t mind at all.


The Ranger can be equipped to tow 7500lbs, the Jeep can do up to 7650, and both offer bed extenders to increase bed space. Both are significantly more since they’re rwd based body on frame trucks.

I agree with Pickle. Im sure they’ll sell a ton to the people that were convinced car based mini SUVs were a good idea.


I love my Tiguan
I used to play guitar.
Dave
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 27630
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:28 am
Location: On the spectrum

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by Dave »

duncan wrote:I love my Tiguan



I bet you do, bud. Maybe you can look at the Maverick for your next car.
MISTER NOBODY™ wrote:STFU Dave
User avatar
TurboPablo
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 29154
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:27 am

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by TurboPablo »

I can't get past the short bed's on any of that style vehicle.
User avatar
GuitarBilly
Chief Executive Owl
Posts: 48416
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:03 pm
Location: Rockville, MD
Contact:

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by GuitarBilly »

The short bed is a deal breaker to me too.
Guitars:
'78 Les Paul Pro / '89 SG Special/ '04 Gibson Les Paul Classic 3 pickup / Jackson Star/ Endres Tele / Fernandes Rhoads/ ''74 Hohner MIJ strat/ 2 Partscasters

Amps:
Depends on when you ask. I got tired of constantly updating this section lol

Cabs
Marshall 1960A w V30s/ Seismic 2x12 w Redback and V30.


Questions about the forum: please PM here. Can't access the forum? Need a password reset? Please access our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/GuitarGearForumOfficial and message me through it.
User avatar
MacaroniSalad
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 2212
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:18 pm
Location: London, Ontario

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by MacaroniSalad »

I’m kind of thinking about one.

I’ve grown tired of the Super Crew F150. I really don’t need this big-ass tub, though it has been nice while doing camping trips and packing all sorts of extra stuff for a 0-2 year old. Plus getting detoured down some ATV trails up in the wilderness made me appreciate the smaller trucks I’ve had in the past.

Really, if If’s and But’s were candies and nuts, I’d be driving a 4Runner, but I feel it would be irresponsible to drop that kind of coin today. :lol: (not that they are really crazy in price, mostly me just being gun shy. Even though I would drive that fucking thing into the ground if it’s even possible.)
User avatar
_ej_
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 10351
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:47 am

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by _ej_ »

GuitarBilly wrote:The short bed is a deal breaker to me too.


I do wish it was a 6 ft bed, but 4.5ft isn't too bad.

This is a ute in trucks clothing but it'd really be handy for me.
Colonel, Fryette Deathsquad

Guitars:
Endres Offset
Endres Offset Les Paul
Endres Telebird
2005 Gibson Les Paul Standard Faded
1978 Greco ES335
Balaguer Goliath Bass

Amplification:
VHT/Fryette Pittbull 50/CL
Marshall JCM900 2500
Vox AC30
Ashdown MAG420

User avatar
rock flag and eagle
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 1949
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:13 pm
Location: Mesa Arizona

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by rock flag and eagle »

they look nice and that's a good price but when I finally buy my truck, I'm going with a big gas guzzling Hemi V8 Ram 4x4
User avatar
Marc G
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 11089
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:07 am
Location: Trinidad, West Indies

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by Marc G »

my Frontier is no beast by any standard..... though it can supposedly haul 7700lbs provided the trailer has independent brakes.... the bed isn't that large at 5' deep, and I lose about 8" at the back because I put one of those rolling lock covers on it, which isn't a big deal for me since its not like I'm planning on loading up lots of shit in my bed, just my rig and some extra shit at most which will fit really easily or a cooler and a few bags if I'm going to a beach house for a weekend........ BUT... it does have 4 Wheel drive with high and low ratios, 6 speed manual gear box and the turbo diesel puts out around 450nm of torque....so it's no slouch either.... on average I get about 21 MPG but on longer drives I've gotten up to 26mpg....

I'd be wary of a front wheel drive pickup since there will be even less weight in the rear so the back end could likely get real lose on you and I'm yet to drive a CVT vehicle I like...
User avatar
_ej_
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 10351
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:47 am

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by _ej_ »

Marc G wrote:I'd be wary of a front wheel drive pickup since there will be even less weight in the rear so the back end could likely get real lose on you and I'm yet to drive a CVT vehicle I like...


That's not really accurate. It will drive like any FWD car because it is basically a FWD car. The bed will likely be heavier than the rear structure of a typical unibody car. Trucks break loose in the rear because the power is being applied there and you're trying to push the motor and the rest of the car. You add weight to increase the frictional force between the tire and the ground (grip).

With a FWD vehicle all the power and the weight is in the front. You're just dragging along the rest of the car which is much lighter relative to the front.

Also this is an eCVT, not a CVT in a typical sense. There are real gears and the electric motor is integrated into the gearbox.
Colonel, Fryette Deathsquad

Guitars:
Endres Offset
Endres Offset Les Paul
Endres Telebird
2005 Gibson Les Paul Standard Faded
1978 Greco ES335
Balaguer Goliath Bass

Amplification:
VHT/Fryette Pittbull 50/CL
Marshall JCM900 2500
Vox AC30
Ashdown MAG420

User avatar
JonVengeance
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 1307
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:12 pm
Location: Northern VA

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by JonVengeance »

I think this thing is a cool option for the right people and the price is pretty good.

I picked up a used 2009 Ford Ranger about 2 1/2 years ago with a 6 foot bed and it's been awesome for transporting band gear, hauling trash, lawn debris, and hauling flooring and materials and tools (big stuff like table saws etc.) from home depot and Lowe's. So I can definitely see the value in a smaller truck. It would be nice having something bigger sometimes, but it's all down to what you need.
User avatar
duncan
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 2119
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:41 pm

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by duncan »

Just looked at the Maverick.

Woof.

If I'm getting a small truck, it's going to be a Tacoma or Ranger.
I used to play guitar.
Dave
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 27630
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:28 am
Location: On the spectrum

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by Dave »

Marc G wrote:my Frontier is no beast by any standard..... though it can supposedly haul 7700lbs provided the trailer has independent brakes.... the bed isn't that large at 5' deep, and I lose about 8" at the back because I put one of those rolling lock covers on it, which isn't a big deal for me since its not like I'm planning on loading up lots of shit in my bed, just my rig and some extra shit at most which will fit really easily or a cooler and a few bags if I'm going to a beach house for a weekend........ BUT... it does have 4 Wheel drive with high and low ratios, 6 speed manual gear box and the turbo diesel puts out around 450nm of torque....so it's no slouch either.... on average I get about 21 MPG but on longer drives I've gotten up to 26mpg....

I'd be wary of a front wheel drive pickup since there will be even less weight in the rear so the back end could likely get real lose on you and I'm yet to drive a CVT vehicle I like...



They'll convince the same group of people that moved from econo cars to econo mini SUVs that they now need econo trucks. It's a pretty big demo of easily swayed people. Personally I feel most of this crowd would be best served with a Prius for the majority of their driving, and the occasional pickup rental or delivery service when they need a sheet of plywood delivered.

Fwiw I would absolutely consider the new Frontier if I was looking at Rangers/Tacomas/etc. Real frame, proper drivetrain, and legit capability.
MISTER NOBODY™ wrote:STFU Dave
User avatar
spawnofthesith
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 10856
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 4:13 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by spawnofthesith »

Dave wrote:
Marc G wrote:Prius for the majority of their driving, and the occasional pickup rental or delivery service when they need a sheet of plywood delivered.




This is what I do :love: :love: :love:



I like our MDX but the 17mpg premium gas is rough :cry:
Guitars: 2018 Gibson Les Paul Standard | Fender American Pro II Stratocaster | PRS S2 Mccarty 594 | PRS S2 Vela Semihollow | PRS CU-22 | PRS CE24 semihollow

Amps: ENGL Thunder | '76 Fender Deluxe Reverb | Mesa Boogie Roadster | Peavey XXX 40 | EVH 5153 50w | EVH 2x12 | Marshall 1960 4x12 | Madison 2x12

Music: https://linktr.ee/jawaofficialband
User avatar
GuitarBilly
Chief Executive Owl
Posts: 48416
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:03 pm
Location: Rockville, MD
Contact:

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by GuitarBilly »

JonVengeance wrote:I think this thing is a cool option for the right people and the price is pretty good.

I picked up a used 2009 Ford Ranger about 2 1/2 years ago with a 6 foot bed and it's been awesome for transporting band gear, hauling trash, lawn debris, and hauling flooring and materials and tools (big stuff like table saws etc.) from home depot and Lowe's. So I can definitely see the value in a smaller truck. It would be nice having something bigger sometimes, but it's all down to what you need.

This is the kind of truck I like. I had a older Ranger (93) for almost 10 years and it was a great truck. Used car prices are crazy right now unfortunately. Also, buying older cars here on the East Coast is different than buying them in CA or NV. Back there, I could buy a 10+ y.o. vehicle with no rust at all, here it's a different story and it's harder to find older cars in good shape so I probably will buy something new when I am ready to buy again.
That said, if I am getting a truck it needs to have a bed that's at least 6ft. I can get 4.5ft of space just by lowering the seats on my little Tracker, don't need a truck for that :lol:
But I think I am going for a mini van for my next car :lol:
I don't really tow anything and all I need is space to carry music gear so a minivan or small SVU seems more logical.
Guitars:
'78 Les Paul Pro / '89 SG Special/ '04 Gibson Les Paul Classic 3 pickup / Jackson Star/ Endres Tele / Fernandes Rhoads/ ''74 Hohner MIJ strat/ 2 Partscasters

Amps:
Depends on when you ask. I got tired of constantly updating this section lol

Cabs
Marshall 1960A w V30s/ Seismic 2x12 w Redback and V30.


Questions about the forum: please PM here. Can't access the forum? Need a password reset? Please access our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/GuitarGearForumOfficial and message me through it.
Dave
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 27630
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:28 am
Location: On the spectrum

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by Dave »

Those older rangers are legit.
MISTER NOBODY™ wrote:STFU Dave
User avatar
TurboPablo
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 29154
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:27 am

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by TurboPablo »

My 98 Ranger had almost 200k on it and ran like a top. But the frame rotted and the rearend siezed up. In a desert climate, I bet it would have hit 250k no sweat. It would have been worth fixing the rearend.
Dave
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 27630
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:28 am
Location: On the spectrum

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by Dave »

Especially given how many of them are in salvage yards. Those rear axles are plentiful but def not worth replacing on a truck with frame rot.
MISTER NOBODY™ wrote:STFU Dave
User avatar
fretless
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 26940
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:15 am
Location: Why am I here, and for how long…

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by fretless »

The old Ranger used Mazda motors for many years iirc
“Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more”
― Nikola Tesla

“I cannot be arsed with this right now”
― MISTER NOBODY™

"Stand up for what you believe in even if you are standing alone"
― Sophie Scholl
Dave
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 27630
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:28 am
Location: On the spectrum

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by Dave »

Other way around. Mazdas were rebadged Ford Rangers.
MISTER NOBODY™ wrote:STFU Dave
User avatar
fretless
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 26940
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:15 am
Location: Why am I here, and for how long…

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by fretless »

Huh I thought they had the Mazda motor too anywho keep on truckin !
“Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more”
― Nikola Tesla

“I cannot be arsed with this right now”
― MISTER NOBODY™

"Stand up for what you believe in even if you are standing alone"
― Sophie Scholl
User avatar
TurboPablo
Crystal Lettucer
Posts: 29154
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:27 am

Re: New Ford Maverick looks rad

Post by TurboPablo »

Dave wrote:Especially given how many of them are in salvage yards. Those rear axles are plentiful but def not worth replacing on a truck with frame rot.



One of my best friends is a master mechanic. I wish I snapped a pic of his face after he looked under my truck :lol:

He was horrified.
Post Reply