Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
mkiii vs jcm800 
Author Message
Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:09 am
Posts: 291
If you set the "gain sensitivity" knob on a Marshall JCM900 MkIII to zero or very low, does it sound pretty much the same as a JCM800 and are the inner workings of those amps the same (minus that extra gain knob on the MkIII)?

There must be at least slight differences because I've heard that the MkIII can sound good at lower volumes but the JCM800 - not so much. I'm asking because there's a guy selling a used MkIII and I'm a bit interested.


Tue Jun 12, 2018 5:49 pm
Profile
Online
Hall of Fame Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 8:00 am
Posts: 7499
Location: Meridian, ID
I can't remember exactly how the two interacted, but I feel I was able to turn one completely down and not cause the volume to cut out. I know my SL-X doesn't interact the way the Mark III did. As far as it being a JCM800, I can't state as I have never played a JCM800. That said, I think the Mark III sounded excellent and the feel was better than what I was able to achieve with the JCM2000 DSL I had (though they sounded similar). I think you should go check it out at least. They really are excellent sounding amps.

Cole

_________________
Amps
Hughes & Kettner Duotone, Puretone, TriAmp MKII
Marshall JCM900 2100 SL-X
Mesa Boogie Mark III Blue Stripe
Peters Halo/Hydra
Rivera Knucklehead 100, Knucklehead Tré, M100
Cabs
Budda 4x12 (Fane Medusa 150)
Hughes & Kettner CC412 (UK Greenback)
Rivera K412T (UK Vintage 30)
Splawn 2x12 (Eminence CV-75)
Splawn 2x12 (Fane Medusa 100)
Splawn 2x12 (UK G12T-75)


Tue Jun 12, 2018 6:29 pm
Profile
Chief Executive Owl
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:03 pm
Posts: 30181
Location: Vegas
I prefer the mark III/SLX over the 800 by a large margin. Better master volume, more gain, effects loop etc...

_________________
Rig:

Guitars: Gibson SG, Gibson Les Paul, Strat and Tele partscasters, Ibanez RG

Amps: Jet City 50H, Jet City Amelia, EVH 5150 III 50w 6L6, Marshall 1960A w greenbacks

Effects: Morley Bad Horsie, Fulltone Fat Boost 3, TC G Major.



Check out my band, The Lima Division at:
http://www.thelimadivision.com


For questions about GAB contact me at admin@guitarampboard.com


Tue Jun 12, 2018 6:41 pm
Profile WWW
Hall of Fame Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2013 1:29 pm
Posts: 3576
Having owned both, I always found it hard to dial in my 900 to have the wide spectrum and growl/decay (whatever you wanna call it) as any of my 800s.
That said, all of the 900 series is killer, and (as Bill said ) the latter 2 incarnations were especially more user-friendly.
I've owned 5 800s, and they all sounded different. A couple of the 2203s I've owned were not very good, actually. But....man if you snag a great 800, keep that fucker forever. :D


Tue Jun 12, 2018 8:06 pm
Profile WWW
Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:09 am
Posts: 291
Is the MkIII perhaps pretty much exactly the same as one of the channels on one of the DSL amps?


Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:48 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:57 pm
Posts: 2468
Haven't owned the Mk III, only the SL-X. I'd say if it's gonna be close to anything on the DSL, probably the Ultra Lead channel on OD1. The SL-X was also a little darker sounding than my DSL. Still brought the Marshall grind, but not quite the top end sizzle. Not a bad thing. One thing that was interesting to me was the dual gains. You couldn't remove the sensitivity completely out of the circuit like you can on the Mk III, and I think that's largely due to having the 4th tube cascaded as a gain stage(s) instead of using the diodes that the Mk III had. However, they were very interactive, not unlike a VHT Deliverance. The preamp control seemed to add gain and low-mids/girth, while the sensitivity control added more high end sizzle and harmonics.

_________________
Murdoch wrote:
Play a scale, he hears, "GOD I BET MY DICK TASTES AMAZING, I WISH I COULD FIND OUT!!"




Charvels, Fenders, Gibsons, Heritages, Epiphones and a Peavey
Metropoulos Metro-Plex
Egnater Seminar Boutikit 50 Watt Head
Avatar Vintage 2x12 w/ Creamback H75s
Marshall JCM 2000 DSL 100
Marshall 1960A w/ Greenbacks
Mesa Boogie Dual Rectifier Tremoverb 2x12 Combo
My Band's Music Page: https://www.reverbnation.com/zerobelowphoenix


Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:58 am
Profile
Online
Hall of Fame Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 8:00 am
Posts: 7499
Location: Meridian, ID
jonpall0210 wrote:
Is the MkIII perhaps pretty much exactly the same as one of the channels on one of the DSL amps?


I would say no, but you can get a similar sound on the Green channel with crunch button engaged. They sound similar, not exact. They feel different to me, and I prefer the JCM900 feel. Go play the Mark III, you will see why it is so well regarded.

Cole

_________________
Amps
Hughes & Kettner Duotone, Puretone, TriAmp MKII
Marshall JCM900 2100 SL-X
Mesa Boogie Mark III Blue Stripe
Peters Halo/Hydra
Rivera Knucklehead 100, Knucklehead Tré, M100
Cabs
Budda 4x12 (Fane Medusa 150)
Hughes & Kettner CC412 (UK Greenback)
Rivera K412T (UK Vintage 30)
Splawn 2x12 (Eminence CV-75)
Splawn 2x12 (Fane Medusa 100)
Splawn 2x12 (UK G12T-75)


Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:16 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 3:37 pm
Posts: 3133
I only tried one 900, it felt more gainy but less good and "pure" than my 50 watt 800 and even though very loud the 800 seemed like a beast vs the mk III. Now, all of that maybe just the differences between cabs used, speakers etc but that is what I felt as the biggest difference. One got better the louder you got that other was worse but still a kind of good amp.

But to be even more fair the same apply to the reissue 800 vs the old one that I have.

I'd keep the 5153 lol.


Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:55 am
Profile
Chief Executive Owl
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:03 pm
Posts: 30181
Location: Vegas
greatmutah wrote:
Haven't owned the Mk III, only the SL-X. I'd say if it's gonna be close to anything on the DSL, probably the Ultra Lead channel on OD1. The SL-X was also a little darker sounding than my DSL. Still brought the Marshall grind, but not quite the top end sizzle. Not a bad thing. One thing that was interesting to me was the dual gains. You couldn't remove the sensitivity completely out of the circuit like you can on the Mk III, and I think that's largely due to having the 4th tube cascaded as a gain stage(s) instead of using the diodes that the Mk III had. However, they were very interactive, not unlike a VHT Deliverance. The preamp control seemed to add gain and low-mids/girth, while the sensitivity control added more high end sizzle and harmonics.

Yeah I agree with all of this.

_________________
Rig:

Guitars: Gibson SG, Gibson Les Paul, Strat and Tele partscasters, Ibanez RG

Amps: Jet City 50H, Jet City Amelia, EVH 5150 III 50w 6L6, Marshall 1960A w greenbacks

Effects: Morley Bad Horsie, Fulltone Fat Boost 3, TC G Major.



Check out my band, The Lima Division at:
http://www.thelimadivision.com


For questions about GAB contact me at admin@guitarampboard.com


Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:19 am
Profile WWW
Hall of Fame Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:18 am
Posts: 993
Location: London, Ontario
My SLX is the Marshall I always wanted 800s to be, but they just weren’t

_________________
When you're down, stare at a Clown


Wed Jun 13, 2018 12:35 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:09 am
Posts: 291
MacaroniSalad wrote:
My SLX is the Marshall I always wanted 800s to be, but they just weren’t


What did you feel was missing from your jcm800?


Wed Jun 13, 2018 3:14 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:18 am
Posts: 993
Location: London, Ontario
jonpall0210 wrote:
MacaroniSalad wrote:
My SLX is the Marshall I always wanted 800s to be, but they just weren’t


What did you feel was missing from your jcm800?


Billy’s assessment was pretty much my feelings. More gain, way better master volume (and 2 , footswitchable masters at that).

Also, I find the tone to be a little “hotter” for lack of a better word. Sounds less like AC/DC, more like Steve Stevens on Exposed

_________________
When you're down, stare at a Clown


Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:35 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:09 am
Posts: 291
Cool. Sounds great to me. Btw. I'm taking the JCM900 Mk III amp to my home tonight to test it with my gear and a/b it with my own 5153. A part of me is hoping that it does both AC/DC crunch and 80s high gain lead tones as well or better than my own amp. Even with the high gain sounds of my 5153, there is an underlying tone that I both like and dislike, kind of like a high pitched tone that can't really be dialed out. It does cut like a beast because of that, though.


Thu Jun 14, 2018 1:21 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 3:37 pm
Posts: 3133
I actually hear that as well in every EVH clip man. You put it great with words.


Thu Jun 14, 2018 2:38 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:09 am
Posts: 291
Btw. what do you guys mean by "better master volume"?


Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:13 am
Profile
Online
Hall of Fame Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 8:00 am
Posts: 7499
Location: Meridian, ID
When I see "better master volume" I tend to think that the sweep through the range of the pot is more consistent. Not something where when you hit 1 it is peeling paint off the wall.

Cole

_________________
Amps
Hughes & Kettner Duotone, Puretone, TriAmp MKII
Marshall JCM900 2100 SL-X
Mesa Boogie Mark III Blue Stripe
Peters Halo/Hydra
Rivera Knucklehead 100, Knucklehead Tré, M100
Cabs
Budda 4x12 (Fane Medusa 150)
Hughes & Kettner CC412 (UK Greenback)
Rivera K412T (UK Vintage 30)
Splawn 2x12 (Eminence CV-75)
Splawn 2x12 (Fane Medusa 100)
Splawn 2x12 (UK G12T-75)


Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:14 am
Profile
Online
Hall of Fame Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:47 am
Posts: 8113
GuitarBilly wrote:
I prefer the mark III/SLX over the 800 by a large margin. Better master volume, more gain, effects loop etc...


This.

_________________
Colonel, Fryette Deathsquad

Guitars:
Offset Les Paul
Telebird
Jazzmaster Deluxe
2005 Gibson Les Paul Standard Faded


Amplification:
VHT/Fryette Pittbull 50/CL


Thu Jun 14, 2018 7:21 am
Profile
Chief Executive Owl
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:03 pm
Posts: 30181
Location: Vegas
jonpall0210 wrote:
Btw. what do you guys mean by "better master volume"?

The 800 gets very loud very quickly, the MKIII has more of a gradual taper

_________________
Rig:

Guitars: Gibson SG, Gibson Les Paul, Strat and Tele partscasters, Ibanez RG

Amps: Jet City 50H, Jet City Amelia, EVH 5150 III 50w 6L6, Marshall 1960A w greenbacks

Effects: Morley Bad Horsie, Fulltone Fat Boost 3, TC G Major.



Check out my band, The Lima Division at:
http://www.thelimadivision.com


For questions about GAB contact me at admin@guitarampboard.com


Thu Jun 14, 2018 7:35 am
Profile WWW
Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:09 am
Posts: 291
I've been a/b - ing the jcm900 mkiii and the 5153 back and forth now. They are REALLY close in how good they are. Both 50 watts, btw. The 5153 has 6l6s. One thing - the mkiii sounds darker and more compressed than the 5153. When you hit f.ex a G5 chord with all 6 strings, let it ring and then hit just the thin strings very hard, the sound doesn't get as trebly as I'd like. It doesn't stick out as much as on the 5153. Is the DSL100's green crunch channel (or even its lead1 channel) less compressed than the jcm900 mkiii?


Thu Jun 14, 2018 3:22 pm
Profile
Chief Executive Owl
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:03 pm
Posts: 30181
Location: Vegas
jonpall0210 wrote:
I've been a/b - ing the jcm900 mkiii and the 5153 back and forth now. They are REALLY close in how good they are. Both 50 watts, btw. The 5153 has 6l6s. One thing - the mkiii sounds darker and more compressed than the 5153. When you hit f.ex a G5 chord with all 6 strings, let it ring and then hit just the thin strings very hard, the sound doesn't get as trebly as I'd like. It doesn't stick out as much as on the 5153. Is the DSL100's green crunch channel (or even its lead1 channel) less compressed than the jcm900 mkiii?

yes, the DSL crunch channel is way less compressed than the MKIII... the OD channel is about the same compression as the MKIII, but brighter and tighter.

_________________
Rig:

Guitars: Gibson SG, Gibson Les Paul, Strat and Tele partscasters, Ibanez RG

Amps: Jet City 50H, Jet City Amelia, EVH 5150 III 50w 6L6, Marshall 1960A w greenbacks

Effects: Morley Bad Horsie, Fulltone Fat Boost 3, TC G Major.



Check out my band, The Lima Division at:
http://www.thelimadivision.com


For questions about GAB contact me at admin@guitarampboard.com


Thu Jun 14, 2018 3:30 pm
Profile WWW
Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:09 am
Posts: 291
GuitarBilly wrote:
jonpall0210 wrote:
I've been a/b - ing the jcm900 mkiii and the 5153 back and forth now. They are REALLY close in how good they are. Both 50 watts, btw. The 5153 has 6l6s. One thing - the mkiii sounds darker and more compressed than the 5153. When you hit f.ex a G5 chord with all 6 strings, let it ring and then hit just the thin strings very hard, the sound doesn't get as trebly as I'd like. It doesn't stick out as much as on the 5153. Is the DSL100's green crunch channel (or even its lead1 channel) less compressed than the jcm900 mkiii?

yes, the DSL crunch channel is way less compressed than the MKIII... the OD channel is about the same compression as the MKIII, but brighter and tighter.


Damn, Billy, now I have to check out the DSL again. :) . Having exactly those options sounds very good to me and like an improvement over the mkiii. And come to think of it, the DSL100 I tried in the music store - I was hitting it with a DS-1X (a distortion pedal) and not an overdrive pedal which would have sounded better and tighter.


Thu Jun 14, 2018 3:47 pm
Profile
Chief Executive Owl
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:03 pm
Posts: 30181
Location: Vegas
I wouldn't say it's an improvement over the MkIII, just a different flavor. The MkIII is definitely a darker amp.. the DSL is brighter and can be more open sounding in the green channel. It also offers a lot more options with the channel/mode switching etc... if you have the opportunity to try both side by side by all means do it.

_________________
Rig:

Guitars: Gibson SG, Gibson Les Paul, Strat and Tele partscasters, Ibanez RG

Amps: Jet City 50H, Jet City Amelia, EVH 5150 III 50w 6L6, Marshall 1960A w greenbacks

Effects: Morley Bad Horsie, Fulltone Fat Boost 3, TC G Major.



Check out my band, The Lima Division at:
http://www.thelimadivision.com


For questions about GAB contact me at admin@guitarampboard.com


Thu Jun 14, 2018 3:52 pm
Profile WWW
Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:09 am
Posts: 291
I might try both the jcm900 mkiii and the dsl100. However, the dsl100 will be a new amp and most likely twice as expensive as the used mkiii (that seems to be in top condition). Also, the more I play the mkiii (not having played Marshalls that much, strangely enough), the more I think I can look at things this way:

For the jcm900 mkiii, the fact the the treble remains pretty much the same regardless of how hard I hit the strings can be seen as a good thing, because a) I don't like ice pick sounds anyway and b) it IS kind of nice that the sound always has a bite to it, even if I hit the strings softly. So perhaps that just good, actually.

Also the compression could also be viewed as good because then I suppose I fit better in with a band, which is what compression does. Essentially, hitting the strings harder on this amp, doesn't make the sound brighter or louder (like it does a little on the 5153), but just more distorted. Perhaps that's just fine and exactly what I need. I do play much more hard rock/heavy metal than blues.


Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:20 pm
Profile
Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:09 am
Posts: 291
The 5153 is fighting like a champ to stay :) . It's more dynamic and sensitive to pick attacks. It's also more screaming and in your face. It's close to a Marshall sound if you dial down the presence, which is has kind of too much of, but not entirely like a Marshall. I might check out some other Marshalls with more vintage sounds and try my Seymour Duncan 805 Overdrive pedal in front of those. I might try the DSL100 today with that pedal, since the crunch channel is probably a bit more vintage sounding than the MkIII. Perhaps I should try having two amps. It is more expensive.


Fri Jun 15, 2018 4:01 am
Profile
Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:09 am
Posts: 291
So I just tested the DSL100 in the music store once more, this time with my 805 od pedal and I was checking the crunch channel especially. Interestingly, although that channel was less compressed and more bright than the MkIII amp, I liked the MkIII overdrive sound better and found it more organic. I also didn't notice any great difference in the amount of treble related to how hard you pick the strings on the DSL100 crunch channel.

So now I guess the choice is to choose either the Marchall JCM 900 Mk III 50 watt amp or the 5150 iii 50 watt amp. Or even both? :)


Fri Jun 15, 2018 9:04 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: _ej_, andvari7, atrox, colejustesen, drs448, duncan, fretless, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], maggotspawn, mctallica1, mincy, phrophus, primeholy, RaceU4her, sah5150, sleewell, Texsunburst59 and 93 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group